daz28

We don't grant 2 point conversions here.

A defensive breakdown that bad isn't the O's fault. If they don't react to it NOW, then yes, it's Brady's fault. The memo has been sent.

Wilted like dated lettuce

Here's the shredding we were all dreading.

So only D backs can hold now?

Didn't learn from Washington yesterday.

Warning incoming

I think it was late hit

Punter should have flopped. He's allowed.

Because their less than free citizens aren't deemed smart enough to be free, which is EXACTLY what they're trying to do here, and succeeding. Do you think America's enemies weren't compromising the pony express? The telegraph wires? The radio waves? The TV? Cable news? The government and corrupt SCOTUS are really making the stand on a video platform, where 12 year old girls do dances? LOL. I watched an interview with a downed Tuskegee airmen who was interrogated by the Nazis. He said he couldn't even tell them anything they didn't already know about him. That was in the day/age when the card catalog was a fresh new idea. I can't get past the idea that you're failing to understand that your data is not safe, and is not a concern of Washington WHATOSEVER. Instead of "buying" their reasons, ask the real questions, like why is my already unsafe data safer w/o Tik Tok, and why is the SCOTUS pitching my freedoms aside for obvious bs.

Raven blitz pickup is sub-par. Exploit it, esp with little RAC on short plays.

Ty Johnson within 10 yds or thereabouts

Even when he's literally trying to use his head, he can't do it.

I think he believes we've turned that corner, when we haven't yet. Still have to mix it up with pass to be effective. We're not a steamroller team

No, those are what they are selling you as concerns. If that's true, then all algorithms are "censoring". The government shouldn't get to decide what is "propaganda", especially when they propagate their own just as much. You know who the best judge of propaganda is? ME! THAT is free speech. You literally just spurned China for banning X, while you're praising trump fiddling with Tik Tok here, LOL

Portnoy has been ROASTING officiating since the Chiefs game.

No, I chose option A: Don't believe or trust their motives, especially when you can clearly see they're conflicting and illogical. The government could protect our data any time they want to, but the oligarchs control them, so it never happens. We can't even have net neutrality ffs.

LET'S GO BUFFALO!!!!!!

If collecting data is "spying", then why can China obtain it from thousands of legal brokers, but just not tiktok. It's about the money and nothing else.

So some corporate board of half Americans will control content, or will the government oversee it? What about FrEe sPeEcH? Like I already tried telling you, your data is already being collected and sold with no regard for anything but the money. Thanks to a new Vermont law requiring companies that buy and sell third-party personal data to register with the Secretary of State, we’ve been able to assemble a list of 121 data brokers operating in the U.S. It’s a rare, rough glimpse into a bustling economy that operates largely in the shadows, and often with few rules. Even Vermont’s first-of-its-kind law, which went into effect last month, doesn’t require data brokers to disclose who’s in their databases, what data they collect, or who buys it. Nor does it require brokers to give consumers access to their own data or opt out of data collection. Brokers are, however required to provide some information about their opt-out systems under the law–assuming they provide one. The tipster told Tau the government was buying up reams of consumer data — information scraped from cellphones, social media profiles, internet ad exchanges and other open sources — and deploying it for often-clandestine purposes like law enforcement and national security in the U.S. and abroad. The places you go, the websites you visit, the opinions you post — all collected and legally sold to federal agencies. In his new book, Means of Control, Tau details everything he’s learned since that dinner: An opaque network of government contractors is peddling troves of data, a legal but shadowy use of American citizens’ information that troubles even some of the officials involved. And attempts by Congress to pass privacy protections fit for the digital era have largely stalled, though reforms to a major surveillance program are now being debated. On today’s episode of POLITICO Tech, Tau and I discussed the state of our personal privacy and the checks on all this government surveillance. I asked what differentiates the U.S. from authoritarian states like China when it comes to data collection, how our digital footprints will impact policy areas like abortion and what broader implications we can expect for civil liberties. He didn’t sugarcoat his responses. “Any nightmare use for data you can think of will probably eventually happen,” Tau said. “It might not happen immediately, but it’ll happen eventually.”

I agree, was just saying if the pass rush is non-existent that will have to change. Loved that blitz right there!

Ray Ray walks it in!

The front 4 has to do that job then, especially if they aren't doing their pass rush jobs.

Who will sell it to whoever they want. Apparently, it only has to be 50% American owners, which also make no sense. Wouldn't you just stop the spying UNTIL it is sold to (half) Americans. The oligarchs will be happy with half I guess.

Took the safe throw, but I'm fine with it.