
daz28
Community Member-
Posts
5,241 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by daz28
-
There should be a national dialogue in getting back to work
daz28 replied to Magox's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
People are killing themselves, because they're laid off, or people are not returning to work, because they make more on unemployment. Peddle whichever narrative fits your unfounded arguments. Classic have it both ways tactic. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
daz28 replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
You call me a dumbass, because you think that illegal immigration, the wall, and overstaying a visa are as connected as potholes and hot fudge sundaes?? You might want to look up the definition of dumbass again, and how it may relate to yourself. To quote the great Ed Bassmasters, "would ya just look at that": NIH recommends against combining hydroxychloroquine with Z-Pak to treat COVID-19 https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/494012-nih-recommends-against-combining-hydroxychloroquine-with-z-pak-to-treat COVID-19 treatment hydroxychloroquine showed no benefit, more deaths in VA virus study https://www.foxnews.com/science/covid-19-hydroxychloroquine-showed-no-benefit-more-deaths-va-virus-study -
Owning a gun to protect your family is not irrational, BUT from a statistical standpoint one should fear diabetes, heart disease, etc FAR more. It would be far more rational to protect you and your family from those things, but I guess that proves people just aren't rational at all. To think people are loading up on guns, yet protesting social distancing is kinda proof of that dichotomy.
-
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
daz28 replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
How does a wall address a visa overstay, and using a baited word like "free" is no way to begin any legitimate discussion. Just so you know I'm not "on the left" either. You'd do well to try to debate from neutral ground at the start. A really important question I'd like asked at the next press conference is, "who told you the 15 cases would got to 0". He's not out leader, he's our president, so he has a duty to answer these questions. You can hate the media, but surely everyone wants important questions answered. The government reports to us. We ARE the absolute authority. They report to us, especially during a pandemic. -
If they want to dump his salary for a 6th rounder that's great, and we should do it(or sign a veteran back). We need a #1b or #2 back. Singletary has 180 career touches. TJ Yeldon had 20 touches last year, and I would certainly not rely on him to be an effective runner, especially with an injury to Singletary. I like them drafting a rookie, but he's just that, a rookie. You don't go out and trade for a #1WR, and leave a huge question mark like that at RB.
-
You don't strike me as the sharpest tool in the shed. HOW can a doctor give consent when there's no testing?? In this case 'consent' would be "have you ever played darts, well it's kind of like that". The doctor may as well be giving consent on Let's Make a Deal about why you should pick door number two by saying, "well most times I watch the show door number two has been pretty good". I think most people(including the president) who have no clue about medicine or how it works probably ought to just leave giving advice about this virus well alone. I'm sorry I left out the most important part. It's INFORMED consent. I took it as a given anyone discussing this would already know that.
-
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
daz28 replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
As we’ve observed, the new narrative in the mainstream media and among Democrats is to argue that hydroxychloroquine is an untested drug It is untested for use with this virus, and that's an absolute fact, unless you consider one doctor giving it to 30 people 'testing'. If this 'journalist' sent this article back to his college professor, I'd hope he'd expect an F. Maybe next time instead of calling out others for what they're saying, he'll just skip right to the part where he proves that their arguments are not factual. -
There is no evidence it works, so why on God's green Earth would any doctor recommend it???? Doctors do not operate on "what do you have to lose, here take this" methodology. They have to actually explain to you the possible benefit and harm of taking a medicine. It's called informed consent, and it's the law.
-
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
daz28 replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I agree with this to a point. If I think I'm on my last gasp(and many people will), I'd say fire away. That's your right, imo. I was going to go all out an try to explain, but truth is the doctors don't understand it yet. If they don't understand it, they cannot make a treatment plan. There is no precedence in medical history where a rumor started a treatment plan, besides rub some dirt on it. -
...and now like Mr President you are also wrong: https://time.com/5808894/hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus/ The excitement over the combination’s potential began with a small French study of people with the novel coronavirus. In those patients, the load of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, in their blood dropped after they received the medications, although their clinical symptoms didn’t change much. In another study of about 100 patients in China, doctors also reported some success in using the drug duo to reduce the viral load in patients. -Oh NOW we trust China Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, said the data so far “was not done in a controlled clinical trial. So you really can’t make any definitive statement about it.” “In general if hydroxychloroquine really, really worked, and it was a magic drug for COVID-19, we would know it by now,” says Dr. David Sullivan, professor of microbiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and an infectious disease physician at the university’s malaria research institute. “Right now we have no clinical evidence that it works.”
-
Is that how radical Trump supporters get smarter by ignoring people with an alternate position? If the guy had of done a good job there, I'd have said so, but it was horrendous. I've always said that if he was just a little different he could have been a remarkable president, but he just can't help himself. Did you hear the words it can't hurt you????????? If you have or are in a condition that otherwise seems irreversible I'm totally fine with an experimental drug. This drug has had NO effect on symptoms. It simply cuts the virus load. I'm skeptical, but damn right I'd take it if I thought I was clocking out for good. The problem is he was saying that there's NO chance it could harm you. HE WAS WRONG. There's not even any logic in him saying that, because no one has any idea if it actually saved anyone, or if it actually made their condition worse or even was the cause of their death. THERE'S NO EVIDENCE!
-
This is why you don't do what he did: But in those few days, a few people who began self medicating with the drugs in an effort to prevent COVID-19 have died, and others have been hospitalized. These tragedies have raised questions about the safety of the drug combo, and how valid they are as a possible solution to treating COVID-19. https://time.com/5808894/hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus/
-
Look, he said that you have nothing to lose by taking it: ABSOLUTELY FALSE He said it can't harm you: FALSE When they tried to ask the doctor about legal ramifications, he cut them off. He was ABSOLUTELY giving bad advice, and it's indisputable. Am I saying it's a bad idea? No Am I saying it's a decision between you and your doctor: yes