
daz28
Community Member-
Posts
5,241 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by daz28
-
While I know ALL of this is fact, I still disagree with you, because deep state media Coronavirus is a democrat hoax. MAGA TRUMP2020!!!!!!! 😉🤣
-
Apparently this guest from the other forum thinks posterity meant make an ass out of yourself, and then leave never to be seen again.
-
Final Vote—All States, Progress in counting
daz28 replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
If your wondering if Trump lost by a LANDSLIDE, just look to the many, many examples of him saying that this score IS a landslide, even though he LOST by 2 million votes. How big of a landslide would he have been calling it if he WON by 5 million. Think about that. -
After a jury of his peers hears all the evidence, and convicts Trump, will you admit he's a criminal??
-
Biden President. Fight doesn’t Stop.
daz28 replied to MAJBobby's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Let's call this playground 'the south' and be done with it. Buh bye now -
Biden President. Fight doesn’t Stop.
daz28 replied to MAJBobby's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Congrats you found more examples of incivility(2) than Trump has found of voter fraud. -
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Politics has had to face the test of time, and much speculation. Religion only hopes time won't destroy it. -
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I like your example, because in both examples you wouldn't have had any choice. That's where we stand now. You get to choose the lesser of the evils. As for things like Stalin vs Hitler, you do have a choice to say you support neither. I'm not sure if you're debating in bad faith, or you just aren't great at it. I try not to turn argument A into argument B, and say they are equal. I just stick to the argument at hand, and that's Trump is worse. Well I may be being coarse, but I mean no harm. Again, things aren't equal. Religion is a belief system, and politics is real. -
Don't for a second underestimate the monster they are going to build if/after he leaves. If you add up all the Republican pundits and add 1,000 it will still be less than the machine Trump could create if he chooses to.
-
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Fwiw, you don't seem to be like the terds that got flushed from here, and you will sometimes still see comments that mimic theirs. That's going to happen in a forum, but you can trust me when I say that it is far better now. They would not even accept any middle of the road interpretations like you and I have. It was their way, or the highway. This goes well with my all evil is not created equal theory. You're right about Biden. I'd rather talk to Trump than him. He's like talking to a bucket of rocks, but he's still a better person/president for our country than Trump. -
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
All I'm saying is that not all evil is equal. Like anything there are varying degrees. It's ok to hate one thing more than another. -
I'll agree with all of that, but there are plenty of hungry lawyers out there ready to take on a lawsuit that will make them money. Thing is having that power is no different than any other large corporation, though. As for it being a BS story, I don't know either way. He could have signed an affidavit, and still put out a Youtube video after. In that sense would it be worth the legal wrangling of the WAPO to dispute it? I have no issue holding my breath for this story. As I said, the real issue is stories like the NY Post throwing out the Biden story, and people like Rudy twisting it into conspiracy w/o facts. Lastly, millions and millions of people are not smart enough to understand what you and I know about Fox. If anyone is the worst player in this 'game', it's CLEARLY them. WAPO doesn't PRETEND to be news or hide under any guise other than they're a newspaper.
-
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
You'd be wrong. I'm simply showing you that one is NOT equal to the other, and I'm not wrong. No need to bait n switch either, because I can throw in that Trump said unfounded that there were 2 million illegal votes, which even though his own administration proved it wrong, he refused to accept it. Unlike Trump, I'm hoping you and I can accept facts. Bro, just cuz you won't accept proof doesn't mean it's not proof. You dismiss Don's "I'd love it", but you relish over Hillary emails. You simply are purposely putting on blinders. Can you look me straight in the eye, and say you believe Don Jr. was REALLY trying to home Russian kids???????????? Is that what he loved? Are Russian kids the same as dirt? You're in complete denial. -
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
If there's any documents left unshredded we shall find out. If you recall(attention span) Trump defied a literal **** ton of legal subpoenas. They can also call these people to Congress w/o any made up executive privileges. If 3 years from now we hear nothing, I won't cry DEEP STATE, but I'll accept it. -
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
It's not the same thing to want a recount conceding you have seen no fraud, and to claim widespread fraud while the election is still live. Sorry, it's not. -
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
You're right. I'm just upset that they're dragging the country through the mud to make money, and create a bigger martyr/demigod. People have short attention spans, so this too shall pass. -
Biden President. Fight doesn’t Stop.
daz28 replied to MAJBobby's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Good point. While some Republicans will understand the gravity of this, many will not be in a hurry to get out, and support LOLfleur and Perdumb. Stacey A will surely be able to fire her people up. -
The Georgia Runoff--So Big!
daz28 replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
It appears Kavanaugh is going to be the sensible one. Barrett might be wise to follow his lead. -
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
The Trump administration has been warned that shredding documents is a CRIME. I hope anyone who follows orders to do so is thrown in prison for a LONG time. Who's overseeing that Rudy???????????? It was far from mirror image though. FARRR from -
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Tell me if you see a difference between this: The campaign is grateful to all those who have expended time and effort to investigate various claims of abnormalities and irregularities. While that effort has not, in our view, resulted in evidence of manipulation of results, now that a recount is underway, we believe we have an obligation to the more than 64 million Americans who cast ballots for Hillary Clinton to participate in ongoing proceedings to ensure that an accurate vote count will be reported. ...and what Trump is doing??? Keep in mind, one lost by having 2 million more votes, and the other lost by having 5 million less votes. -
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
The guy says if Russia calls(which they did) he would listen. Then Russia calls, Don Jr says I'd love to hear it. That's game, set, match right there. When I opened the vault, there was no money in it, so I'm not a bank robber was their claim. -
Were Democrats sore losers after the 2016 election?
daz28 replied to Westside's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf it concluded, as have other assessments of Russia's efforts, that Moscow "engaged in an aggressive, multifaceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election." From a REPUBLICAN Senate committee. 1000 pages. Take your time