Jump to content

daz28

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,241
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by daz28

  1. If you plug all of the factors of yesterday's game into the equation, that number changes drastically.
  2. So if I get this right, the people are arguing today that those who felt it was inciteful were wrong, after they were basically proven right by a riot/insurrection??? The claim must be that it was coincidental, and they just happened to get lucky by predicting it? I'm really just curious how it's not a violation of the 1st Amendment for the DOJ and White House(both government entities) to be involved with what should be censored on Twitter??? Yet the same people are arguing that private citizens, lobbying groups, Twitter, as a corporation, and its staff ARE bound by the 1st Amendment. This is pure Cuckoup land.
  3. The bible is a big enough book that through selective interpretation, one could probably find a way to back all kinds of discrimination quite easily. I guess the Supreme Court will just handle these on a case per case basis, unless they just want to roll with the all selective interpretations matter principle.
  4. Is anyone here an English teacher? I'm not, but I have written enough college level papers to have a basic understanding of how it works. The 'massive fraud' I'm assuming Trump is talking about is the 2020 election. If so, then the statement SHOULD have been written ""A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude ALLOWed for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution". That is what I believe Trump is claiming he meant to say, but it still doesn't make sense, because absolutely no one believes "ALL the rules, regulations, and articles, even those in the Constitution" were allowed to be terminated. Now, we could suppose he also incorrectly added the word "all". I suppose he could have made some attempt to explain what he meant by "all" of the rules, regulations and articles that were terminated, but instead he chose to cry 'fake news twists my words'. My personal opinion is that he was trying to justify his attempt to get Mike Pence to go against the 12th Amendment, which states verbatim: 'the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted'. At best, he poop tweeted a terribly written statement, and at worst he was attempting to justify a possible crime. It's intriguing that this post came right after the White House lawyers testified to the grand jury(s). That's what I based my opinion on.
  5. They'll build on this. We ain't used to having both
  6. Ellicottville apple pie shine. Cheers
  7. Operation Bobby Hart fall forward engage
  8. It's on the D at this point. How much give is too much?
  9. So far so good. Don't play vanilla on Parcells becuz of injury. He can smell that stuff
  10. Not possible. He was a meat zombie
  11. If we keep playing HS football, Parcells will try a fake
  12. Both. One zombied back to the huddle
  13. The line is definitely banged up no question.
  14. Don't worry, he'll plant them eventually. Then look out
  15. He still manages to make the most out of the spills tho. Got like 2 after that one.
  16. So far the coordinators get credit for working with less
  17. Is there something in the water tonight, or is it me?
  18. No mines great. a couple replays were weird framerate, otherwise stellar
  19. Amazons video has gotten a lot better than at first
  20. Josh has no interest in letting history get behind him.
  21. Catch me after the game for post-game tailgate! How bout dat!
  22. Im sure keeping Josh alive is considered in the play calling
×
×
  • Create New...