daz28

I mean if that's how it is, you don't want to be the only guy following the 'unwritten rule'. It's also a division foe, so it makes even more sense.

Obviously, nothing is guaranteed. They do have the pick of the litter, and if they did their scouting right, that puts them in the best position to avoid that happening.

If you consider the value of a good QB on a cheap cap hit for up to a decade, the price really isn't that high.

Absolutely, but not everyone is as smart as you and I. That's why I'd rather have the guys we voted in to do their actual jobs, and not hand it off to a clearly slanted media outlet. It clearly doesn't help security one bit, and some people will believe Fox no matter what they say. People even believe them after it comes out they're lying. It's really quite perplexing. I don't care if the criminal has a R or D next to their name, but you aren't going to get the straight truth from a news source in this subscriber based news cycle

I'm always for transparency, but here's the catch. This investigation was SUPPOSED to be about Capital security. Well, instead of maybe, you know, reviewing the footage, and finding ways to have better security, they shipped it off to Tucker Calson and God knows who else. They can't have it both ways. Either we should see it, or it remains a Capital security issue. It can't be both. Please stop making this discussion about me, because it's not.

You were the one who supposed, and failed to address my question. Why did the government provide this to Tucker, and not its citizens? Why didn't THEY go over it, and release findings to the public?? You know their jobs??? If we're not allowed to see them, and only be fed what Fox news wants us to see/hear, then the government is using media to CENSOR us. Now if you want to just attempt to pick this apart with a partisan political answer, go ahead, but it sure does make it look a lot like hypocrisy. PS, I already know you wanted them released, but that's not the question I'm asking.

No, it would mean they're pro American taxpayer. I'm guessing they already gave up on the Covid stimulus accounting though, which was only $6 trillion.

Can't get the socialist federal government in there quick enough to waste taxpayer money on this national crisis train derailment, which possibly could have been avoided with proper regulations. Hypocrisy everywhere.

So you're trying to accuse both of us of hypocrisy, because only one of us has actually admitted it? I'm also kind of not real happy about the government COLLUDING with the media, with a man who's reputation isn't to be taken seriously(his lawyers argued it), and who has been proven to pushed false narratives, to censor what I can see. That would make it 2 hypocrisy's for the price of one. 😁

When is Tucker going to show us the parts of the Jan 6th security footage he thinks we should be privileged enough to see? Does he have a security clearance that the rest of us don't have? If not, why wasn't it all made public?

I had those tail light blackouts on my Z28. They were illegal, and got pulled over for them

Those same people are furious right now

Td Eagles. Yeah boy. Actually no TD, yet

When's the Gronk kick? Halftime?

There shouldn't be a database in the first place. If you remember, this started with the 'liberal bias' in media, which is about as fake news as you can get. Both sides have their own separate media sources, that thrive off of their partisan bias. Well, some people took it to the next level, and accused social media of being favorable to the left. Then Elon dragged it to the next level, and accuse the left of actively censoring tweets. As it turns out, they ALL had their hands in the cookie jar(which I'm sure E-lyon didn't know). What is lost in all this partisan nonsense is the fact that NO ONE in government should be censoring anyone, because it against the Constitution. I know there's a line where a government employee's job and personal life are blurred , but some of the calls were/are coming FROM THE WHITE HOUSE, ffs. The whole thing is just a mess, just like everything else in this country, and the only thing that keeps fueling this stupidity is everyone's need to defend 'their side', while the bad actors go about their nefarious activities and lobbying.

The fact they didn't take the Teigen post down is enough to satisfy you? The point was that there is an entire database of requests to censor from all kinds of government officials. THAT is the point here. That and it exposes Musk, and everyone else who were pointing their fingers at one side for their partisanship/hypocrisy.

Mr. Roth should challenge Mr. Jordan to go ahead and put his accusation in writing, so he could see him in court later. Playing to uncredible accusations your base wants to hear is one thing, but taking a slander to libel is another. Mr. Clay Higgins is another one in wayyy over his head. This LSU dropout horse rancher: Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) accused a panel of former Twitter executives of allowing the FBI to help Joe Biden by suppressing "criminal evidence being revealed" via a story about Hunter Biden's laptop. -what criminal evidence would that be??? "You people interfered with the United States of America's 2020 presidential election, knowingly and willingly," Higgins said. "That's the bad news, it's gonna get worse," he warned. "Because this is the investigation part. Later comes the arrest part." -By withholding a story for 24 hours to verify?? They want so bad for what they think is going to be true, to be true, that they forgot that stumping for campaigns, and investigations are two completely different things. Ideally, during an investigation, you ask the questions that will help prove your accusation, but all they're saying is, 'you did it', and they're under oath saying, 'no we did not'. I wonder how Mr. Higgins feels about Mr. Eastman attempting to halt the congressional electors count under what he admitted he knew were false pretenses? I doubt we'll ever find out.

Apparently, Chris doesn't like people giving so much "testimony" under oath??? Personally, I'd love to hear some sworn testimony from more people, especially those who were asking for pardons, but I guess subpoenas aren't what they used to be(for both sides).

So you think he's lying, even though potentially all proof of this is in the hands of someone who would just love to blow it all up??? If you'd like to join Jim Jordan in that, then that's your choice. I'm going with the guy who bet 5 years in prison that he's not, for now. All the Twitter files did was expose that all kinds of people are in their ears trying to censor, and that's from both sides. If I did have a major concern with that, it would be that the the White House, and congressmen were in on it, too(from both sides). Imo, that is censorship. Fwiw, here's the whole quote from Scalia, "I think Thomas Jefferson would have said, "˜The more speech, the better.' That's what the First Amendment is all about, so long as the people know where the speech is coming from," he said on CNN's Piers Morgan Tonight. "You can't separate the speech from the money that facilities the speech." -I'm guessing, from my interpretation, that Mr. Scalia believes that people with more money would also have more free speech then. He obviously missed the word, 'abridged' then, because that would mean that people with less money would indeed find their speech curtailed(abridged). Not a Scalia fan, but here he's clearly getting something wrong.

What he said is undoubtedly true. Facebook and Twitter are literally living proof that 4chan, and all of its spawn, drive away users(less speech). He admitted the 24 hour holding of the story was a mistake. Apparently, Mr. trump feels that 24 hours proves the election was, "RIGGED AND STOLEN". By who though, Twitter?? Seems like a pretty insane stance, by a desperate man, to me. Not sure how communism ties in here???

Jim Jordan gets KO'd in the first round with sworn testimony that the FBI didn't direct the 'censoring' of Hunter's laptop. He continued to push the narrative anyways, saying he "thinks" they did. Roth testified Wednesday. “I don’t believe that perspective was shared by law enforcement — they didn’t endorse it, they didn’t provide that information in that meeting.” Roth added later in the hearing that "a representative of another tech company may have mentioned it" but "I truly don't recall."

Now that shove was just plain dumb

The loss of Purdy was not an unforced error. Reddick was running wild and free, and that is something SF had to prepare for. They also needed to challenge that catch.

I agree with this, but SF somehow thought they wouldn't have to block an elite rusher. That was massive mistake #2

Did you see the drop, the calls and the fumble by the backup QB?