
SirAndrew
Community Member-
Posts
6,091 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by SirAndrew
-
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Thank you for this, I’m not getting into the political aspect or trying to blame anyone, but it’s frustrating to hear random people continue to state there is no PPE shortage. People are so addicted to choosing a “side” these days, that they don’t live in reality. Masks are being used multiple days from boxes that say “do not reuse”. That shouldn’t happen, and hopefully it never happens again. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
You’re definitely correct about Florida. It may be too early to tell. I’m just throwing out my random theory that I could see them doing a little better than some of northern states. Florida has an outdoor lifestyle, and nothing that compares to the density of NYC or Boston, I could see them faring a little better. People in NYC love getting out and socializing. That’s what draws so many to that city. Unfortunately, in the time of a pandemic that becomes a hurdle to overcome. NYC has millions of people attending functions on a daily basis, all jammed into crowded rooms indoors. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Does anyone actually believe China’s official number though? I know I don’t. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Florida’s numbers are low. I wonder how much that might have to do with fewer large groups congregating indoors. People move to Florida to be outdoors. As bad as a crowded beach is, the NY subway is far worse. Northerners spend so much time traveling outside of the home to engage in indoor activities. People in Florida had spent much of March outdoors. Aside from shopping, many large events are held outdoors in Florida. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
No plan will work if a nation lies, but if we have enough hospital beds, ventilators, and proper American made PPE, we’d be in a better position. I’m not even placing blame on particular people outside of China, just saying what’s crucial for the future, even if we are deceived once again. That’s where the West failed. We aren’t set up to deal with the reality of pandemics. This might just be the tip of the iceberg for all we know. We need to mobilize preparation in health like you would with defense. Pandemic preparation is now part of our defense program in many ways. The military prepares for whatever comes their way, even when deceit is involved, that’s where we need to be with public health. We can’t depend on China or international organizations to save us. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
That’s one of the failures of the Western world I’m taking about though. We all need to end our dependence on China. It’s a scary and very dangerous position to be in. It’s not the fault of you or I, but it is a failure due to many years of terrible policy by the Western world. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Absolutely, I just mean the Western world as a whole was/is not prepared for a pandemic. It’s a reality of the modern world, and the lack of preparation needs to change. China was very deceitful, and deserve much of the blame. However, we live in a bizzare time when the word of a communist/totalitarian state is taken at face value. China might have lied, but organizations like the WHO and other Western agencies need to do better at questioning information coming from China. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I’ve always been a non-partisan thinker, as I believe there is right and wrong regardless of party affiliation. Honestly, no one got this right. There are no hero’s in this story, except for the first responders and people working the front lines. China and then much of the Western world failed with an adequate response. No one was prepared, it’s as simple as that. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
There are very valid economic reason to end the lockdown. The medical claims of that article are complete nonsense. Ending the lockdown right now likely causes more deaths and possibly overburdens the system. It needs to end at some point, but let’s not act as if we’ve solved the problem, and our actions haven’t reduced infections. It does need to end, I just hate to see it end too soon. Articles like that get many of the facts wrong imo. -
The world’s best hope has always been internal strife within China that alters the CCP. Nothing else is likely to actually change the threat posed by China.
-
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
We’re definitely on the same page. Hopefully cases are reduced to the point where contact tracing can be helpful. I just think some people are confused, seemingly believing contact tracing is useful right now. With the possible exception of remote rural areas, there’s no use in contact tracing at this time. I can’t believe how many health departments are still wasting their time doing so. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
What countries have made contact tracing work? In nations such as Italy, and the US it’s spun too out of control to do so. If you’re referring to nations such as South Korea and Singapore, you are correct. However, those nations are smaller in size without multiple waves of infections and patient zeros in hundreds of huge cities. They caught it early on when contact tracing was still viable. Contact tracing isn’t practical right now in the United States imo. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Distancing helps, I completely agree. I just believe it’s too prevalent for contact tracing to work. When we trace someone’s contacts, do we quarantine them all ? Quarantining every contact is impossible at this point. Also, who did the person testing positive get the virus from? Lastly, we have no idea how many are asymptotic, so trace all my contacts, but the asymptomatic person who gave me the virus is still passing it around. Contact tracing works with a very rare virus, or if you immediately catch it entering the country. Contact tracing is almost worthless when a virus has entered every community. Keep in mind, this is not an expert opinion, but just my belief based on what I’m seeing. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SirAndrew replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I hate the idea of this pandemic being used to end privacy, and I’d really like someone to explain to me the point of contact tracing. Contact tracing is used for containment of disease. Aren’t we past the point of contact tracing when the virus is everywhere? I haven’t read anything discussing this point either. We need to admit we’ve lost this battle as far as containment, and the virus will do what it’s destined to do. I’m in favor of maintaining the lockdown, and keeping people as safe as possible, but contact tracing is meaningless at this point imo. -
Gore getting handoffs inside of two minutes at the end of the first half was boneheaded. I’m not sure why, but that sticks with me more than Knox missing the block.
-
Why do we need a WR in the draft?
SirAndrew replied to MrSarcasm's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Fair enough, but it’s not just about having four guys on the field at the same time. It’s about the rotation throughout the game. Guys come off the field during the game, and although four WR’s might not be on the field at the same time, they all get playing time. I’m not overdramatizing the need for a fourth WR. We will be fine, but an upgrade over what we have couldn’t hurt. That’s all I’m saying. If any of our top three are out, I really don’t want to see Williams, McKenzie, or Foster play. I’d rather give a rookie a chance. -
Why do we need a WR in the draft?
SirAndrew replied to MrSarcasm's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Good point. People who act like the fourth WR doesn’t get any playing time aren’t aware of how football is played in the 21st century. -
Why do we need a WR in the draft?
SirAndrew replied to MrSarcasm's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I get your point, but there are teams who have a fourth WR I like more than Foster, Williams, McKenzie, or Roberts. Those guys are not NFL caliber wideouts imo. If they are pressed into service, we’d make due, but I’d draft someone in hopes of them being an upgrade. I’d just attempt to upgrade depth at that position in the draft, as opposed to free agency. -
Why do we need a WR in the draft?
SirAndrew replied to MrSarcasm's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Yeah, our top three WR’s are a nice group, but no one below them on the depth chart should be on the field as an NFL WR imo. That’s a problem, and could be easily remedied by drafting a wideout. John Brown had a spectacular 2019, but he’s had an inconsistent career. I don’t count on him repeating last years production. Obviously, Diggs will more than make up for whatever drop in production Brown could have, but if Brown or Beasley slow down a bit, another option would be nice. -
Rosenthal: True QB value rankings from 1-35
SirAndrew replied to chris heff's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I think Daboll needs to develop a better grasp of what his players are capable of. He does a poor job of instinctually feeling the situation, and calling plays accordingly imo. That QB sweep was the perfect call, but the execution was poor. However, I just got done watching the season on game pass, and it seemed like called QB sweeps failed often last year due to poor execution. I’m not sure that’s the play I’m running, as opposed to keeping an unstoppable Singletary involved. I know it’s probably an unpopular opinion around here, but Allen’s best runs generally come on scrambles. I don’t want to take that part of his game away. Personally, I’d like to see fewer called runs with Josh this season. He’s a QB whose competitive nature causes him to take lots of big hits. A big guy like Allen isn’t going to be protected by the refs either. Scrambling is a great part of his game, but I’d like to see Daboll lessen his wear. -
Rosenthal: True QB value rankings from 1-35
SirAndrew replied to chris heff's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I really like Josh’s potential. He has already inspired more hope than any QB since Kelly imo. However, it’s all up to him this year. I’m not going to be here making excuses or listening to others excuses for him if he doesn’t progress this season. It’s a make or break year, and if he can’t get it done, he’s not the QB of the future. I believe that he will get it done, and he’ll move up everyone’s ranking if he does so. -
Rosenthal: True QB value rankings from 1-35
SirAndrew replied to chris heff's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I get that, and thanks for posting the link because I like these type of articles. I just meant that some people tend to overreact to these type of things. I really like Allen’s potential, but I wouldn’t expect him ranked higher than 20 something by any non-Bills fan. If he progresses the way he should, there’s no way he won’t move up in these type of rankings, even if the writer isn’t great. -
Rosenthal: True QB value rankings from 1-35
SirAndrew replied to chris heff's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Josh Allen has a chance to prove himself big time this season, no need to be all hurt over a low ranking. -
For one day be nice to Robert Kraft
SirAndrew replied to Ed_Formerly_of_Roch's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I agree, kudos to him. He actually stepped up to get much needed supplies. How many billionaires have billions tied up in their “charities and foundations”, yet haven’t stepped up to provide in this time of need. He contributed something quite useful right now. It might be, but at least it will be utilized. It’s better than some useless donation stashed away for unknown purposes.