mbs

I would like to agree, but players don’t play to the rule they play to the enforcement. Ease up and they will just play dirtier. I don’t know how to fix that.

I have always assumed when people want a chip in the ball that they think some sort of wireless telemetry will provide an exact position and orientation of the ball at an instant. Thus no refs spotting anything. I can't imagine such a technology exits, but I'm not an engineer. The visual wireframe they describe suggests an aid for refs to spot the ball accurately by giving a 3d model with presumably very precise positions. That tech definitely works. So yeah, I think their proposal would fix Kinkaid's spot and maybe Josh's as well. The system would prevent the whole conversation that goes, "well from this camera angle at least, it looks like his elbow is over the 45, so his toes must be just behind the . . . " nonsense. The imaging would let us know instantly where all the body parts are to the inch and there's no need for some microwave triangulation or whatever the "chip" is supposed to provide. And, yeah, I have only once thought the chain gang leaned a flag, otherwise it's always the bad spot and with a poor camera angle it's tough to overturn. Also, I would rather have an onside kick that must be pre-called than go to any 4-15 gimmickry.

Get rid of regular season overtime entirely. Playoffs get additional full quarters until someone wins. “Chip in the ball” probably can’t work with adequate precision so the visual wireframe reference points make sense. Might not help as much as we hope. 3 sounds great. Still don’t like the new kickoff.

You are probably right about the value of a Jefferson. But I think they will treat WR as a need. Our efficiency on offense is despite a weakness at WR. All teams have weaknesses, but I would prefer ours not be WR. Not sure how the Bills' corps compares to KC's but neither is exceptional which -dammit- is making your case about not needing one. Regardless, they will have some money next year. Maybe Cooper or Samuel will turn up big but there has to be a cap fit, even if it's a stretch, that's better than either has been to this point. Whatever it is, I don't think it's Shakir.

Still think they can get there without him, but I agree. I'd be much more convinced by the everyone eats mantra if he showed what I expected when he was signed and I still think he may.

Love Shakir, but no. I think this team still needs a better receiver. I think they can win it all, but it is definitely a liability. "Efficient" is nice but it's also pretty close to cope. I think the injuries that have plagued them in the playoffs past have led the organization to prefer excellent but not elite starters and very good depth over elite starters and bad backups, particularly on oline and defense, but it looks like that at skill positions too. Their arguably league top 5-10 players are Dawkins, Brown, Cook, Benford, and Bernard who are, apart from Dawkins, draft picks that are on rookie deals or got locked up at what looks like a great value. Even Dawkins is maybe a bargain. I think that's a strategy, but I gotta believe --hope-- they would break the bank for a Justin Jefferson if they could. (Or Garrett/Crosby. . . please.)

Shady sighting. Unmistakable body language.

QBs and skill position players should wear football print sleeves if you ask me. It's like when I played little league and no one could tell when I threw a knuckleball.

Has anyone mentioned yet that Kromer made Karlos and Gilleslee look like Shady? Cook deserves an extension but someone else will overpay.

Gotta be Herbert it’s been happening through three coaching staffs. Seems that way anyhow.

I’d like to see Keon get just over half a touchdown. Even better if it came in a pass from Josh for say just over twenty-one and a half yards. That would be nice to see. No reason.

Looking back on my rookie or even second year assessments, Damar was third string at best, Bernard was an undersized player and waste of a pick, Williams was flat out terrible. What were they thinking? And I'm a homer who's a sucker for those players who "show a spark." If I continue to be a terrible judge of talent, then Bishop (who doesn't look anywhere near as awful as those guys did) will be All-Pro next year.

OJ is without question the best running back in history and I don't think it's particularly close. I was too young to appreciate it, but thanks to online video being a thing and access to stats everywhere, I am entirely convinced. I loved watching Bruce and to this day, I think he is the best DE to ever play. But it's debatable. I voted Josh Allen because I have seen Josh Allen play.

The Bills may have offered him money.

Orton flashback

Someone sold their soul for this ridiculous Chiefs season. The curse on them is no one can believe this crap.

Probably because there's no sour grapes in KC. They are acknowledging Allen as the clear 2nd. Dolphins are coming to terms with Tua not being in the running at all and every other team with an also ran (LAC, CIN, BAL, etc.) is committed to pretending they wouldn't be much happier with Allen. (Well, Baltimore might have a fair claim which I never thought before this year.)

How do I repeat “LOL” one thousand times.

If Stroud had Robert Foster, this wouldn’t be close.

Thanks to Devante, Rogers is back! They are number three with a bullet! Might top Miami even. Wow.

This is my favorite football game ever. (Comeback being a close second)

Awesome schadenfreude game!

Is COT Cyrus O’Torrence? If so, who the heck is Cyrus O’Torrence?

I think many are missing the real opportunity which is for a mere twenty-five grand, you can be almost assured of winning a 25,100 bucks!

I expect the best receiver on the team next year will be Coleman. I base this on the fact that he's the best receiver on the team. I'm not gonna overthink this one.