-
Posts
381 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by PittsforDave
-
-
7 minutes ago, Steptide said:
Not a single practice all week and they'd start him Sunday? That seems crazy. I know Peterman isn't good, but you can cater the game plan to set him up to succeed (ie do not throw to the sidelines)
Playing Nate is surrendering, which is the same as conceding.
At least Derrick gives us a slight possibility of a win.
- 1
-
What other option do we have?
Playing Nate guarantees a lose.
Derek is really our only real option atm.
-
Pathetic. Fire these clowns.
- 1
-
4 minutes ago, MJS said:
Go ahead. Keep freaking out. It won't change anything. The Bills made a huge cap dump. They knew the ramifications of that. They of course are trying to win despite that this year, but they new things would be rocky.
You can call for everyone to be fired, but ultimately that is up to the Pegulas, and they know the plan better than you, me, or the media.
Please stick to topic, no one is freaking out.
These are quotes from our GM and you just dismiss them as false then stick to your own (obviously wrong) narrative. Unfortunate.
- 1
-
8 minutes ago, MJS said:
You expect him to say "We were expecting to be horrible this year. Sucking is all part of our master plan!"
Don't believe anything you hear in these press conferences. It is all coach and GM speak.
These excuses are tiresome. Then you don’t believe any of the article? What’s the point? It’s all just fake news, right.
-
Key quote:
second to last paragraph. Proves this was not planned.
“...teams that are not doing as well as they hoped”
”we’re trying to win here, not only now but in the future”
They expected to improve this year and look at the disaster we are in now.
Collapsing wasn’t part of the plan!!
-
Peterman is making me question my loyalty to this team.
I thought i was was a hardcore fan, 23 year season ticket holder, I watch every snap every week.
However, I just can’t seem to get on board with the position we are in. I just don’t identify to this loser mentality and accepting failure.
It is against everything I believe in, I strive everyday to be my best.
The team to just roll over and quit is against what I believe in and I’m finding it difficult to relate.
If Peterman starts, I will have no choice but to distance myself and my money from this team. They are just morally wrong.
I hoping that Anderson practices Friday and Allen is back after the bye
- 1
-
I don’t know. They have a proven winner as a coach.
Id prefer to be in their position.
- 2
-
Park at chucks house. 39 Glen St. 14127.
$10 bucks a car. Easy in/ Easy out. No childish rules. You’re welcome to have a good time.
Back entrance through the fence.
If nate plays, you’ll probably be out at half time, so leaving will be extra easy.
-
Good coaching can make bad players look good.
Our coach makes good players unmotivated. Not a good coach.
-
Daball should just wild cat the entire game with McCoy, Pryor and the other rb.
Putting Nate in is just surrendering the game which guarantees a lose.
If we are losing on purpose, McD has got to go.
Objective is to win and improve. Not get blown out in 80% of games.
No way Nate Plays, it would be pure sabotage and a complete joke for the rest of the nfl
-
1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said:
I forgot about Matt Moore. Does he want to play? Because he's clearly a better option than most of these guys.
Yeah. Matt is hungry to play. He is itching to get off the couch.
-
Just now, SoCal Deek said:
Sweet! Last time we picked at Number 3 we landed Dareus. Flash forward and folks are once again dreaming of yet another D Lineman. Round and round it goes.
Yup. See what happens when ego gets in the way of building a roster. The wheels just keep spinning.
- 1
-
Kelly
Kaep
Moore
-
Just now, Kwai San said:
I dunno dude - I don't wanna rain on your parade but Peterpick IS starting and there is NO forfeiting in the NFL......just saying...
If peterman plays it’s surrendering which is similar to forfeiting.
Sit the starters if we surrender.
-
6 minutes ago, Kwai San said:
Not that I want you to be wrong but please enlighten me as to your logic.......Bart Starr is starting? Jim Kelly perhaps? Maybe Chad......WTF is going to start dude?!??!?!
Playing Peterman guarantees you a loss, guaranteed.
Logically, you have to have a plan for the scenario we are in now, worse case.
Our coach is trying to stay competitive and trying to save his job, he’s not an idiot. Getting blown out again will be unacceptable.
With this pop Warner offense, anyone can step in and play. The two new options are better than peterman, at least they give you some small hope of a win.
Playing Peterman is the same as forfeiting.
If Nate is considered, we might as well forfeit and avoid injury to any of our key Defensive players.
-
8 minutes ago, Kevin1778 said:
He isn't the worst in history. You listen to too many idiots in the national media. Guys like Randy Fasani have worse career ratings. The media just lies. I posted his home game stats in the first post in this thread. They are fine. Stop believing idiots and their made up narratives.
Ignorance is bliss...
-
Just now, Kevin1778 said:
You have no idea what you are talking about. Peterman played just TWO awful games. Both on the road. One as a rookie against the #3 defense in the NFL and one as a second year QB against the #1 defense in the NFL. He was fine against the Texans. He gave the Defense a lead. The fact he put up the only Bill's passing TD in last 23 quarters and he did it trailing by a few points in a close game shows he can play.
I have no idea what I’m talking about?
Nothing you say can change history. He is the worse in history.
Defending this guy is just foolish and silly.
-
30 minutes ago, Kevin1778 said:
Peterman is starting. They aren't putting a 35 year old guy coming off a concussion on the field. It is a PR nightmare if he gets hurt, not to mention insane. This bad line could literally get him killed. Anderson will be out through the bye. You don't play games with a guys health when he did you a favor coming out of retirement to mentor your QB.
What’s insane is putting the worse player in the history of the nfl in the game. It won’t happen.
You have to give McD the benefit of the doubt, he’s not an moron. He has a plan. And Nate can’t be part of it.
36 minutes ago, billsfan_34 said:So you are Saying if Anderson doesn’t play then it is Barclay or Pryor- neither of which have taken an NFL snap at qb in some time and dont know the playbook? Thats a very bold prediction.
Im not sure im following you here? Expensive how?
My 6 year old daughter knows the playbook. Run, run, pass, punt.
Thats how its been, nothing’s changing.
Pryor or the new kid will play qb.
-
I can assure everyone.
There is zero chance Peterman sees the field. Zero. No way.
He will not play.
-
Unfortunately. We have to. Our Bills are in a sad state. Another year with bean could get even sadder.
There has to be silver lining, somewhere.
-
Just now, BullBuchanan said:
If our FO believes this team can win 10 straight games with the hardest schedule in the league, they should all be fired immediately, because they're not mentally stable.
Yeah I agree. Most people with loser mentalities aren’t stable.
-
3 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:
You can choose to not agree with a fact, but it doesn't stop it from being a fact. Might as well pretend the earth is flat.
I don’t think our fo thinks the season is over.
Why not just forfeit if this is a fact?
Winners win; losers make excuses.
-
3 minutes ago, joesixpack said:
Who decided to buy them?
I bought them after the playoff run last year. Guess I was duked. I will never make this mistake again. What a waste of time and money.
I feel like I deserve a refund. I feel like I’ve been conned. There has to be a legal way to recoup my funds.
What theyre doing has to be illegal.
Derek Anderson Hasn't Been Declared Out for the Bears Game - Now Declared Out!
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Gives me a ton of confidence also. But at least he would be a better option than Peterman.
Might as well forfeit and avoid injuries if Nate plays.