Tsaikotic

Princeton Review "The national average for the new SAT is 1500. For the ACT, it’s between 20 and 21. If you are close to these averages you will likely be accepted into a considerable number of colleges and universities (as long as you have decent grades), but may not be considered at more selective schools. Above average SAT/ACT scores will improve your chances of getting into a more selective school. Scores below an 1100 on the SAT or a 15 on ACT are considered low at just about any four-year college. You can overcome low scores with good grades or an outstanding application. But even if you’re accepted by a four-year college, the school may advise or require you to take some remedial courses as a freshman. Unless you pulled in a perfect 2400 or 36, you can always improve your score. " 2400 = perfect 1500 = national average 900 = fail / loser ...amazed he could spell Jets

maybe, just maybe, if a deal is in the works...we run ML and the Packers coaches tell the players to not touch him cuz they don't want him hurt...ML runs for 300 yards and 4 TD's and never gets hit to hard...Bills win and then trade ML on Monday..hehe...ok I'll shut up now

has anyone even picked him up yet??

good point..lol

everything I've read on him says he's not quick enough to be a tackle...I'm assuming the Bills are waiting on Wang to get healthy to be the RT...IMHO, which doesn't amount to squat, they might be trying to see how he does at C and then maybe by years end we see this line: Bell - Wood - Urbik - Levitre - Wang...with maybe a LT being drafted next year if Bell doesn't show improvement...But then again he might be here for just depth

what's mind-boggling is the fact that ppl keep dissing the Bills FO for not trading Lynch to the team we will be playing this weekend, before we play them...anything could happen after Sunday...not saying the trade is going to happen or not, but com'on..would you really trade Lynch to the Packers when the Bills could use any advantage they could get to try and win the game?

I thought Bell did great in preseason games 1 and 2, but he looked average in the last 2 games(JMO)...doesn't mean they don't keep him tho...as for Bell outplaying ML, it's kind of easy to do when ML only played a bit of game 1 and then some in game 4. I don't think this team has enough "star" players to have any real surprise cuts...so my notables are: McCargo, Lankster and Hardy

I don't think we're to far apart on this roster..only real wonder I had was if they keep BigMac at FB or go no FB...also not sure which of the two new TE's they keep or if they go after another teams cut-offs...anyone have any idea on Wang...is he even playing in the PS yet?? (Offense = 25 ) QB(3) - Edwards, Brohm, Brown RB(4) - Jackson, Lynch, Spiller, Bell FB(0) - TE(4) - Stupar, Nelson, Schouman, Foschi WR(6) - Evans, Johnson, Parrish, Jackson, Nelson, Roosevelt OG(3) - Wood, Levitre, Howard, (Calloway), (Meredith) OT(4) - Green, Bell, Meredith, Calloway OC(1) - Hangartner, (Wood) (Defense = 25 ) DE(5) - Stroud, Edwards, Johnson, McCargo, Carrington NT(2) - Williams, Troup OLB(5) - Kelsay, Ellis, Torbor, Maybin, Coleman ILB(4) - Pozluszny, Davis, Mitchell, Moats, (Torbor) CB(5) - McGee, Florence, McKelvin, Corner, Youboty SS(2) - Whitner, Scott, (Wilson) FS(2) - Byrd, Wilson (ST = 3) K/PK - Lindell P - Moorman LS - Sanborn PUP - S Jon Corto IR - TE Joe Klopfenstein, TE Michael Matthews, WR Marcus Easley, OLB Danny Batten

and this should effect you how?...maybe all your job interviews should have a list of all you've slept with so they can determine if you slept with the right ppl.

You only think I guessed wrong! That's what's so funny! I switched glasses when your back was turned! Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous is never get involved in a land war in Asia, but only slightly less well-known is this: never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ---

PFT Shaun Rogers could be a good NT for a few years while a draft pick develops...wonder what pick they would want or maybe a player we have for him...Whitner and a 6th and 7th maybe??

I could see this happening also..at least for next year, then after a second draft with Chan they might get the guys they need to go full 3-4

while Schobel might be comparable to Kampman, he still isn't Kampman...you can't tell exactly how it'll play out with Schobel till you see him try OLB in a 3-4...not saying he's going to be good or not, just saying you can't label all Kampman look-a-likes as kampman...I'd like to see how Schobel plays, still waiting to see if he retires I think tho...

just a hunch but, it might be bad to get rid of all your players with no replacements in line for them...I'd like to assume that while 3-4 players come in, the 4-3 players will be let go, traded or whatever...jmo

the fact is is that they were on the team b4 they got Aikmen..his statement was that Dallas got Aikmen and then got the o-line after Aikmen...fact is they had newton and Tuinei on the roster b4 Aikmen and they got there pro-bowl C in round 2 of the same draft as Aikmen...so they did not get 5 new o-linemen after they got there franchise QB...I'm not saying this is the way to build a team or not the way..just letting him know that his crusade is flawed.

Aikmen was drafted in 1989 after Dallas already had LT Mark Tuinei and LG Nate Newton...it seems they got there O-line b4 and during the draft with there franchise QB... C Mark Stepnoski was drafted in round 2 of 1989...Nate Newton was switched to RT in 1990 and then switched back to LG in 1992, the year he went to the pro bowl along with his C Mark Stepnoski...so basically the Cowboys had 3 multi-pro bowl o-linemen on the team and then in 1990 they got TE Jay Novacek to help...The Cowboys switched arround there line a few times in the early 90's, but there LT was there a few years b4 they ever got Aikmen...so seems your sol on your assessment

well, it's definatly not Al Davis

hmm..well..they would be athletic...have 2 legs and 2 arms...they would all wear the same uniform, well ok not the same, but they would all look the same...some of the guys would be between 220 - 260 lbs and some even bigger than that...eye and hair color would vary..well you get the picture...

yea, I mostly took him because I didn't like any of the other choices..not the players but the positions...I feel with a switch to 3-4, we need more Defensive players...I could be wrong, but WR isn't on my list of needs.

yea, read that this morning...they really don't know anything about football it seems

ok so so far its: 1 - Davis OT 2 - Cody DT 3- Norwood 34OLB 3 - LeFevour QB guess I'll take another 34OLB Selvie

wow..after doing all that I realized we had some really sh!tty players

Id go: QB - Drew Bledsoe (2002 - 2004) Lt - LG - Ruben Brown (2000 - 2003) C - RG - RT - FB - Larry Centers (2001 - 2002) / Sam Gash (2003) RB - Willis McGahee (2004 - 2006), Marshawn Lynch (2007 - present), Fred Jackson (2007 - present) WR - Eric Moulds (2000 - 2005), Lee Evans (2004 - present), Josh Reed (2002 - present), T.O (2009), Peerless Price (2000 - 2002 / 2006 - 2007) TE - Jay Riemersma (2000 - 2002) DE - Aaron Schobel (2001 - present), Kris Kelsay (2003 - present), Ryan Denney (2002 - present), Phil Hansen (2000 - 2001) DT/NT - Pat Williams (2000 - 2004), Sam Adams ( 2003 - 2005) LB - London Fletcher (2002 - 2006), Takeo Spikes (2003 - 2006), Kawika Mitchell (2008 - present), Paul Posluszny (2007 - present) CB - Antoine Winfield (2001 - 2003), Terrence McGee (2003 - present), Nate Clements (2001 - 2006) S - Lawyer Milloy (2003 - 2005), Donte Whitner (2006 - present), Jairus Byrd (2009 - present) P - Brian Moorman (2001 - present) K - Rian Lindell (2003 - present) KR - Terrence McGee (2003 - present) PR - Roscoe Parrish (2005 - present)

well..I'm voting for Cody DT but this is what I keep getting..: "Sorry, an error occurred. If you are unsure on how to use a feature, or don't know why you got this error message, try looking through the help files for more information. The error returned was: You did not choose a poll choice to vote against. Please go back and ensure you click on one of the radio buttons next to the choice you wish to vote for"

ok nvm on my first post here..I noticed that in this thread you have us trading with jax and getting the #50 while in the other thread you have us trading with Houston at #20 and the #50 and the jax option has the #75 a 3rd round pick...so looks like you mixed the two together lol...so since the jax #11 and 3rd round #75 actually won in the other thread I assume that's what you really wanted to go with here...so I'll just pick 1 hehe.