wnyguy

I bolded the part that you carelessly did not CAPITALIZE in your response to Tommy Callahan. It would seem to me that the bolded part is the main crux of the tweet. That the judicial oversight body deemed it appropriate to begin an investigation seems a tad bit interesting, not a gotcha but interesting, no?

Yes, but he did it with a certain "oomph" that may have been lacking in your post.

What does that tell you about the alternative, you big dummy.

Well, he got better.

You know I agree with your opinion, while I find it tragic when a woman aborts I also realize the abortions will happen, either legally or illegally. I feel that since abortions will happen it should be done with the proper medical procedure for the health and well being of the woman.

There's only one idiot here and it ain't me.

I wouldn't call it a deflection, simply an observation. But I think we found common ground.

I don't know the circumstances behind her actions but it seems that celebrating of glorifying what she did is wrong in anyones mind.

Growing up my neighbors had a sheep farm, they noticed some of their lambs we're getting killed so they watched the fields where the sheep were and eventually saw two dogs attacking the flock. they shot the dogs but didn't kill them. The two dogs belonged to us and they both ran back to our property. The neighbors recognized that the dogs were ours and came by and explained the situation to my dad. We had to find the dogs knowing they were wounded and when we did find them my dad, with tears in his eyes, had to put them down. It was truly a sad day for my family and also my neighbors.

Funny that the killing of a dog gets people riled up but the killing of unborn babies just a shrug of the shoulders.

Hit it straight.

I hope he already filled out his absentee ballot.

Bruins vs Leafs in the first round. Who do I hate more? Will be happy for whoever gets knocked out in the first round.

The one trial I was on a jury was a malpractice case. I knew the plaintiff and the doctor being sued. I told them this during voir dire and they asked if my knowing both parties would cause me have an opinion before the evidence was presented. I said no and then they named me foreman.

Served on a jury twice, both times made foreman.

It would appear they don't need a permission slip, they will be given a shot wether they want one or not.

You got kids?

Heeey, fuhgeddaboudit.

Your name is Irv yet your pic is Clip. What's up with that?

That's what we've been trying to tell you.

So you don't mind helping them as long as they stay over that way. I see how it is.

We'd all just be sitting around with our feet up.

The guy had a very large cranium.

Deterring? Or aiding?

No, no, it's not what we believe on the right that matters. It's what you on the left say must matter. You should be forced to stick with the ideas you have shoved down our throats. You said believe all women except in this case cuz her story hurts the Dem President. Now what's it gonna be, believe all woman or not?