No_Matter_What

I am really curious how Beane plans to trade down from 252

I absolutely love this. We don't have roster spots, we didn't have many picks, and if there is a reasonable chance then 2024 will be stronger draft then Beane is doing best thing he could possibly do.

Lol this is first class trolling from Beane

Don't trade out this time pls. I don't need to mow a lawn or something, I just want a new Bill already! Like I said, RB Sean Tucker is my guess.

Interesting. I'd be shocked if Torrence wasn't a starter Day 1 in 2023.

Now this is something! Draft picks next year, I like it.

Nope we had 215

For 230 and 248?

LOL trade... really? Way to ruin my next couple of minutes haha

Based on this list my completely uneducated guess is that we take Tucker. I expected them to draft RB late in Day 3, we've met with him and he is available.

So, Dean it is

Why do you think he won't make 53? If I am not mistaken our 5th rounds picks (almost?) always make roster, and right now he is WR6 with ST ability (which we tend to have every year IIRC, last year it was Kumerow). Not saying he's a lock but I do expect him to make 53 right now.

So do Bears

Seems that we went 13 spots back to 150. I guess we get 193 or 215 in return.

Nope. You misunderstood me or chose the wrong guy to fight with I love Beane, I love what he has done, I think he is a top 5 GM. I didn't say he doesn't know how to build the roster. I love first two picks this year. I just said I dislike his approach to Williams pick IF he wasn't BPA on their board. That is all. Hope it makes sense.

As for Torrence - I understand your concern, but there really should be one. If he is as good as borderline 1st round pick, we just have to find the way to use him. Period. Adjust scheme if need be. I for one LOVE that we tried to bolster Oline. I couldn't be happier with our first two picks. Williams - hate the approach. Did someone ask Beane if he was BPA? I am not able to evaluate player myself, but my approach is following - if he was BPA in their eyes, then fine, even if he won't replace Edmunds, or if we are not sure how to use him. But if he wasn't, and we reached for "need", and we are not even sure if he fits the need, then it is an awful way how to build the roster. And I don't care about Bernard. If we made mistake with Bernard, I am completely fine with them admiting so and drafting another guy. All I care is proper roster building strategy, and that does not include reaching for need.

I say let's wait how today shakes out and then I post my comments. I have my own roster chart I'll post it here tonight.

Well apparently you didn't show up today, which is weird, so hopefully everything is fine and you just didn't have internet or something.😟

Go on record, who did you want when we were on the clock? I considered including "should've try to trade up for Trenton Simpson using our 5th rounder" option but we have no idea if anybody was willing to trade with us and how far it would get us so I just left it with available guys.

Not knowing the player, so can't judge him, but from what I read you are correct - we reached for the need. And that is a bad thing. We didn't "have to". We should've taken BPA on almost any position in 3rd and figure out who plays instead of Edmunds later. Loved first two picks, don't like this one (not a player, but the approach). Let's just hope he turns out to be a long-term starter. @gonzo1105 I hope you're right

They don't have to love Spector. They love Josh Allen and wanted to invest in offense. That is what we all wanted.

Not necessarily. Just don't overthink it Beane. Draft BPA now, whatever it is, CB, DE, DT, S, LB, WR, whatever. Just no RBs pls

Yeah but they keep mocking "consensus" guy out there, and it is not happening in reality. There will be some of these players when we pick for sure.

Hyatt, Simpson, Adewabore, Johnson, Tillman, Downs, Ika, Clark Phillips, hell maybe even Washington Lots of good options.

Go on record, who did you want when we were on the clock?