No_Matter_What

Yeah I thought he was a bust all along!

It is getting pretty clear that unless we have huge gap between WRs trading up doesn't make any sesne.

Yeah it is a danger, but it only matters if they take our guy. And nobody knows who that is.

I really hope that Beane is more patient than TBD members lol. Not every team needs a WR

So Vikings already don't have 2nd, 3rd and 4th round picks next year? That is an interesting strategy for an average team at best...

Beane stay patient please

I just hope that Beane knows better.

Not a single defensive player in top 10. Wow

We never had a chance. Back to Earth now.

Whatever we do, I'll support it. Odunze, Legette, Thomas, McConkey, Worthy, Coleman, Franklin, trade up, trade down, stay put, whatever, just make the right choice Beane. Go Bills.

Agreed. @Simon isn't it time to unlock it?

Why didn't you make a poll? It's easy, I think you can still add it.

You guys know that your TV's have nothing to do with the Bills picks, right?

Would be cool esp. if Bills are really targeting Legette or Franklin (I know you don't want him in the first but maybe the Bills do). Maybe to do 2 small trade down to make sure you don't fall too much and land a guy you want. Fwiw, in our mock 49ers traded up with Eagles to get Mims, while the Chiefs were trying to do the same.

Gunner, sort of random thought, but do you see any reasonable chance that either Ravens would want to jump the Lions or that 49ers would want to jump Ravens/Lions? We just had local community moct draft with me as Bills GM and I managed to trade down with Ravens - picks 28 and 200 for 30 and 113. I risked almost nothing and got Legette. Ravens did it for Barton IIRC. I really liked it for Bills, pick 113 is a nice extra asset to move up in the 2nd. Do you find this realistic in real life?

Wait, so Legette is there at 60? Then just pick him and call it a day. Thomas and Legette? Are you serious? If both pan out, we are unstoppable for next 4 years and then we pay one and get comp pick for the other. If one pans out it's still great.

It's actually 2 WRs but the point remains.

I love this result, it is at least good experiment to see what a trade down like this can mean and who can we miss out on. Or, on the other side, who we can still get lower. 41 is little too low for my taste but still a good exercise.

I love what we are doing. Everybody and their mother knows we are drafting WR round 1 so we don't even try to hide it and are doing all the work that can be done. This way nobody knows which WRs are we in fact interested in.

Lol I just found out and came to post this. Sportrac doesn't say anything about incentives but it doesn't mean there aren't any. Anyway, it is a low cap hit, but at the same time it's all guaranteed, so he is either lock to make the roster or leaves us with $1,5M dead cap and no savings if cut.

Who from tier 2 and 3 would you consider for Bills at 28? I guess tier 1 is out of question and I doubt tier 4 and below could even be BPA on your board when we pick.

He was taken at 12 😀

Ok, np. But since you wrote the bolded, it seems that I wasn't clear enough. What I mean is that once Bills are on the clock, you wouldn't start the poll immediately, but give all other GMs a chance to send their offers (within an hour or so). If there was any reasonable offer, you would include in the poll. So the poll would be very specific, something like - player A - player B, etc - trade down with team X (pick 28 for picks Y and Z)

Virgil, did you think about possibility of including trade down in the poll when Bills come on the clock? I know it is not easy to manage but something like giving all other GMs one hour to send you offers and if there are any include these in the poll? Just a thought since people are talking about trading down quite a lot around here imo.

While I understand what you are saying, I wouldn't call a chance to draft Nabers a "tough spot to be in"