Jump to content

No_Matter_What

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,820
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by No_Matter_What

  1. On first glance it seems very well balanced in almost everything to me.
  2. Wow. Thats cool. I'd say they have too many consistent leaks to be completely fake. I tend to believe it. So it is either vs SEA, @ ARZ, @ SF, vs LAR or vs SEA, vs LAR, @ SF, vs ARZ
  3. Yep and from the same source we know that NFC games are W1-W4 and that 49ers play with Pats* W2, so we play @SF W3 or W4. Still only rumors obviously.
  4. Now lets see if I managed to put tweet in my post. EDIT: I suck. Yolo could you explain to me how you do it? EDIT 2: Thanks Yolo!
  5. Thats why we want full season, open vs the best, kick their asses and start 3-1 at worst! I'll wait for full schedule to make my prediction but I can totally see us going 3-1 after losing either Cards or Rams and winning rest. Seahawks at home would be a great opener.
  6. Well FWIW their leaks of specific games are consistent with their theory about OOC games being scheduled W1-4.
  7. Well its safe to say that if they really use that format season will feel quite different. Not sure what to think about it, but whole situation is extraordinary so I am fine with extraordinary solutions. As for the Bills this means very tough stretch at the beginning of the year, which is fine with me. Do you guys think that we get @SF and @ARZ in cosecutive games? If yes, how does it work? Do they stay on the West coast for the week or do they come home?
  8. Oh so frontloading NFC games would be with intention to cut them (i.e. don't play them and play shorter season) in case that NFL has to start later? That makes sense, thanks. Only I wouldn't call this as a solution in case that they want to postpone the season, but shorten the season. I guess we need to wait two more days ?
  9. LOL sometimes it looks like they intentionally didn't tackle him. Kid is fun to watch, thanks.
  10. Can somebody please explain the bolded part? I am missing the point. How does putting NFC games helps if season is postponed? I guess it makes some sense but I don't see it.
  11. Someone should sign him for more than NE can afford just to screw them.
  12. Zay was picked prior Beane's arrival, wasn't he?
  13. Not an answer to OP, but isn't it like 99% sure that someone gets traded until W1? There is not a reasonable way how to keep 10 DL on a roster, is it?
  14. Thanks for the write up MB. You commented on the actual picks, but were there any players which you liked much more in respective rounds when we were picking? Edit: Also, can we please avoid that silly discussion that FireChans started? It brings nothing to this thread.
  15. What does this mean? Is Hauschka as good as gone? Or they can keep him based on camp competition and stash this guy on practice squad?
  16. I wonder if we take Weaver if he is somehow available.
  17. Gunner I am sort of confused by the lack of excitement on your part. Guys we drafted may be "solid" but overall result is amazing. Epenesa was around 25 on most big boards, including yours. He is not Chase Young, but he was consensus late 1st/early 2nd round prospect for a reason. And we got him at 54. That is amazing result in my book. Overall tone of your assessment sounds like we drafted him at 33 or so. That would I call "solid". Moss I understand your reservations about playing style and how it fits Bills need, but I think you partly admitted you were wrong about how we can utilize Singletary. So I wouldn't stress what type of back he is and just be happy with his level of play. Overall, we had biggest needs at WR, DE and RB. We drafted and "drafted" Diggs, Epenesa and Moss. That sounds like a dream to me. Just to be clear this is not an attack on you I just would expect you to be more satisfied overall based on your own board Anyway, moving on to day 3, can you adjust your board for Bills and list your top 10-15 choices for us?
  18. They just drafted top proved WR1.
  19. Only thing I know is that I trust Beane.
  20. And who do you actually want for us?
  21. Claypool to Steelers sucks for Bears. They could have had another TE.
  22. My guess is we take CB and there will be lot of sad faces here.
  23. Why do you consider it as a great pick when you have like 13 players graded ahead of him?
  24. Don't they have like two of the best paid CBs already?
  25. They need dance partner though.
×
×
  • Create New...