Jump to content

VW82

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,623
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by VW82

  1. Nice. Josh should settle down now. Hopefully that's the end of the turnover-worthy plays (four so far).
  2. WTF how you gonna throw into triple coverage there????
  3. We need this to change the game. Once Josh sees there's help, he'll calm down.
  4. Bernard needs to step it up in run D. He's getting erased.
  5. Benford's done fml. Concussion protocol is a joke.
  6. Josh is not himself. Somehow, he needs to pull through this rough patch and get in the endzone. Get some confidence back. Edit: both drives end because of Josh mistakes.
  7. Would've been a flag if that was Mahomes
  8. We need to spread them out but Josh is super jittery
  9. Ravens did the same. Need to respond in kind and we'll be ok. NO MORE INTs PLEASE
  10. Down 7 and a possession to start 2nd half isn't great but still early
  11. Two pick-worthy throws in the first series. welp.
  12. Otherwise known as the "we have Josh"ness. Whatever happens, it's going to be ok.
  13. That is such a bad comparison. Their route running abilities are nothing alike. They don't even play the same position. Yes, Kincaid has been downfield more and him and Josh have missed more. A lot of that is Josh throwing hopes and prayers to him on failed plays. It's too sss. Edit: you want to criticize his run blocking? Be my guest. Kincaid still looks the part of a quality receiver and the fact we haven't been more successful with him in that role is a blame pie not an indictment of Kincaid specifically.
  14. I'd love to see this followed up on by someone if they have them handy. Also, HappyDays is just flat wrong about the variance comment. In-season numbers can carry a tremendous amount of variance. Even just looking at last year vs. this year we see Dalton's catch% going from 80% to 58% despite having an entire extra off season to work out any issues re "not being where Allen expects him to be be." NBA players demonstrate tremendous variance in 3FG% as an example over small samples < 100 attempts, and they do not have to worry, usually, about being tackled. Yet, we think we shouldn't see such variance despite additional variables over relatively small sample sizes in NFL receptions. Doesn't make a lot of intuitive sense. And just to add to previous points, Knox went from Y/R of 8.5 last year to 14.1 this year (66% increase). Is that because their "chemistry" dramatically improved downfield finally in year 6? Knox is now finally exactly "where Allen expects him to be be." No - there are surely other things going on here. Some of the inconsistency is clearly on Kincaid, but he's been way above average in the passing game this season. His issue is that he's not so great in the running game - our bread and butter - and so he's ineffective on a greater percentage of plays than he would've been in Dorsey/Daboll's system, and there have unfortunately been some misses (some on him, some on Josh) which have skewed the numbers and would likely correct pretty dramatically over larger samples. /rant
×
×
  • Create New...