donbb
-
Posts
437 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by donbb
-
-
-
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:
There is much more important information and evidence in that thread than in the entirety of most MSM rags and outlets over the past two years. You should read it all. You might be surprised.
It's a shame that information is only barely afloat in the bowels of Two Bills Drive.
-
Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:
Enjoy the wing nut madness as entertainment and don't take it personally when then act like a horde of lost fools who agree in steadfast circlejerkery.
It seems like it can be a sort of choose your own adventure story - especially with that first post in the deep state thread. Post a reply and learn all the secrets of the deep state.
-
-
25 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:
Unhinged. Your special web powers detected that huh? Damn you're good. Please continue to humor yourself wing nut. Too easy.
Hooray - at least there is one other sane Bills fan here.
- 1
-
Just now, DC Tom said:
They're stonewalling. It shouldn't take nearly this long.
I've seen how this works. For it to take this long, DoJ documents would have to be in such disarray that they would never be able to use them for a criminal indictment.
Excuse my ignorance, but what documents in particular are the DOJ taking too long to produce to the subcommittee?
-
9 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:
I just wonder what the process is for the DOJ to provide the documents the oversight committee seeks. Is the DOJ stonewalling or does it just take a lot of time and steps to hand over the documents?
Likely the later considering the fact I laid out above. If the oversight committee was doing their job faithfully in their request of these documents, certainly more than 2.5% of their colleagues would agree with impeachment of Rod Rosenstein.
-
Just now, Doc Brown said:
Timing is weird as they're going on recess soon and there was no chance they're going to impeach Rosenstein. Makes it seem like a publicity stunt.
Of course it was. A whopping 2.5% of the House members signed on for Rosenstein's impeachment.
-
57 minutes ago, teef said:
i don't know the first thing about brewing, but time and time again, i've heard that point 1 is super critical...for both wine and beer. if the components aren't cleaned properly, it leads to awfulness.
You've definitely got the first thing about brewing down.
-
17 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:
I prefer the drinking of beer as opposed to the making of beer.
If you're not drinking beer while making it, you're doing it wrong
16 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:I used to brew a lot more often than I do these days. I'm lucky if I brew twice a year now, but it's not rocket science to brew great beer at home. The two or three most important things that people neglect that lead to less than stellar product..
1.) Improper sanitation. If your fermenter isn't properly cleaned and sanitized it's highly likely you'll get some funky off flavors.
2.) Not pitching a big, healthy yeast starter. If your yeast isn't rip roaring and ready to go when you pitch into the wort the yeast will become stressed...and stressed yeast can make for a nasty tasting beer. I've talked to many craft brewers over the years and one common theme that they all mention is that the majority of homebrew they try is woefully under pitched.
A little less important is..
3.) Fermentation temperature. I like to get my ferment my ales between 62-68. However, brewing in the summer months it's often difficult to achieve temps this low without a dedicated thermostat controlled fridge or freezer. Fermenting up into the low 70s isn't a huge problem as long as you adhere to 1 & 2 above.
Great tips - especially #1.
In regards to #3... I have an American Brown Ale I just brewed a couple of nights ago and the proper fermentation temp is 68. With the heat we have had, though, even my basement is warmer than normal and I can't get the fermentation temp below 70. It will be interesting to see how it turns out!
-
Is this entire forum filled with Q/Trump conspiracy crap? Holy moly - I've read through 3 threads and I think that's more than enough.
-
9 minutes ago, njbuff said:
Now a ridiculous tape is CNN's way of trying to get Trump.
The madness continues.
Unless the judge is a staunch liberal............ any other judge would laugh this tape off in court.
Judge Napolitano disagrees. He's the furthest person from a liberal.
-
4 minutes ago, row_33 said:
needs some fap material
The Clinton memes are too old hat at this point.
-
3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:
Why?
Transparency
-
Does anyone brew beer? I've been doing it for a couple of years now and absolutely love it.
I'm working on plans to have a different beer brewed for each Bills game this year (a recipe for weeks 1 & 2 have been created so far)
For Week One I'm planning a Raven Black IPA.
Week Two will be a Charger California Common.
What do you brew?
-
3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:
This should scare the hell out of more than a few "journalists".
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1022097879253635072
I hope each tape is released in full for the public to hear.
-
Daboll should tailor his offense each week to exploit our opponents deficiencies on defense, unfortunately I don't think the Bills have the personnel to do so. I hope fans have patience with Daboll to see him through the 2019 season.
-
Just now, oldmanfan said:
When they come out yesterday and make the announcement and don't take the time to realize that 2 of the 6 people already had lost their clearance, yes that makes it partisan politics.
The announcement was an attempt to distract from the Manafort trial - as was the IRAN TWEET. Both tactics worked.
- 1
DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Turn on CNN and break out the pop corn. Rudy is going to say something dumb again.