This part is fairly ridiculous, I mean sure we can all agree that we all have innate rights, but this just comes off as some inane rhetoric that ignores the obvious thing that the government obviously has to enforce and define those rights. I mean I can get it if you don't like how they're defining them, I might not agree but I get that, but I mean what's the point being made here were they supposed to stop making adjustments after they founded the country, because there were some issues if you might recall.