Pokebball

Interesting. Obviously, it was possible to give more than one answer. It is really, really, easy to not get pregnant if one doesn't want to get pregnant. I think some personal responsibility would go a long way to eliminate a need for abortion.

"They" is probably me. What do I oppose?

Yeah, we knew this before we did it. Eyes wide open!

That's the plan

Sure, but the root causes aren't an either or. The right thing to do isn't always the most popular

Let's assume they did. Would you then support restricting all other abortions in the 3rd trimester?

Like I said, it doesn't sound like its BS as you represented

Doesn't sound to me like it's BS then.

Seems to me the simple solution for you lefties is to take 3rd semester abortions off the table in policy. If it's a crock of BS like you say, why won't pro abortion folks simply agree? What do you suppose the reason to continue to fight against banning 'em is?

Imagine a Rmaswamy v Harris debate. Wowsers

To me, there is a spectrum of wokeism. Some consider the simple acceptance as being woke. To others, concerns don't manifest until activism is introduced. Soft vs hard woke, if you will. Personally, I'm accepting of anything an adult wants to do. I don't bring an "in your face" activisim to anyone and I expect the same from those I choose to interact with. Those that feel the need to get all activist, from any perspective, aren't in my social circles.

"in no way"? You wouldn't make a good investigator

Sure there is. A lot of circumstantial evidence to support the actual hard evidence, such as $$ to family members. Lots of $$ to family members.

Cast that stone

No

No you won't. You'll rationalize some sort of difference

How much time you got?

The Dems started this shyt. You should be proud!

Where you at on Mr. Epps

I think Gabe should be out there

If Josh shouldn't throw to Gabe, perhaps Gabe shouldn't be out there?

did she try to fill it herself or did she send fred flintstone?

Assume you're correct. Could Trump have failed any more significantly than he did? Fred Flintstone with a flagpole? For Pete's sake!!!

Legal experts have specifically stated that this recent indictment is based on "novel legal theory". That's why I put it in quotes. Heavens!

Attorneys disagree with each other all the time. That's what they do. This is why we have them. Some legal positions are, what shall I call it, based on "novel legal theory"? That's why higher courts toss cases out. If I were to make an allegation, it would be that some internet legal warriors believe they have a better grasp of the law than do others. We're taking the level of legal debate to a place that probably exceeds a sports message board. I'll always make fun of that. Always