Pokebball

Biden and Garland are above the law

More ways to peddle fear

McConney knew Cohen was a creep and stated such. McConney grew tired of all of the lawfare directed at Trump and his organizations and wanted out. That doesn't make the NDA illegal nor does it not make the NDA not a legal expense. I'm not going to litigate this on this board with you. Both our minds are made up. The jury also heard about the texts that were happening at the same time. And so did Cohen for the very first time. The prosecution failed big time in that moment.

We'll see if yours and Billsy's wrangling survives. It's looking like it might not even survive the kangaroo / banana court. It certainly won't an appeal. If you think there's a chance, your not following along.

Oh, I do. You're attempts at wrangling in order to make it fit your narrative is valiant

Probably Soros

When has Cohen not felt cornered?

Probably Soros today Calling an NDA expense a legal expense isn't falsification. Not by any stretch of your imagination

Who's paying you?

Cohen is about Cohen and lying to further himself has never stood in his way. He just can't help himself Even if he was losing, it would be a terrible idea. But he aint losing!

He would if he's losing, he aint losing Some of you stated you might believe Cohen. Have you made that decision yet? I'm honestly curious?

Only way Trump takes the stand is if his legal team thinks he's losing. He aint losing!

you dems said this in 2016

Well, I'm retired is my reason

Not my wages

Why must we mock each other?

I'm speaking for myself. I wish Trump followed me and my opinion more often then you didn't read all of my posts

Of course not. Nothing is wrong about expressing the view that family is important. I can't believe folks are getting their panties in a wad over this.

Frankly, I think a man's role is fulfilled by being a dad and husband. At least mine is.

FBI is scheduled to make a visit to his house this Sunday

All this has been answered above Well then, maybe

I have no clue what your talking about. Exactly accurate!

Ha?

Why do you even go here? No one is saying every judge in every case is. This one is and it's so obvious. My point is you and some others can't see this one is purely political. Sheesh, we all need some reasonable senses on politics these days. I've stated it a few times and I'm not going to repeat myself over and over with you.

Agree, it's clearly political and some of you on this board do not comprehend any of it The case is very weak and is relying totally on activist prosecution, judge and jury. The case has no chance of winning on appeal, if these partisans in the case decide against Trump. None