Pokebball
-
Posts
3,256 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Pokebball
-
-
8 minutes ago, Homelander said:
Go to the 3:50 mark
-
1
-
-
On 9/23/2025 at 5:56 PM, nedboy7 said:
Just wondering if you know Trump is trying to shut down the gain of function research going around. I dont think so. Is he really funding research for real health and nutrition? No. It is easy to just claim certain things should not be allowed. Is he going after all the pollution, industrial farming and meat production, the insanse drugs they pump people up with, or even the endless sugar and processed foods going into kids? Nope. But yeah some libtard thinks men can have babies so lets have mass executions like Levi wants.
We're doing GOF research?
-
4 hours ago, Saint Douggie said:
Huge game. Need this win to strengthen their position for the 1-seed and the division. Lose and you're prob gonna be sweating out the rest of the year. They need this game
agree, the most important game is always the next game
-
or perhaps elections is our way out of this? as it should be!
-
1
-
-
45 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
nah, that comes in the evening. been out chipping, putting and hitting bunker shots....all I can do til they fix my back. Cannabis is legal in Va. Just harvested my 4 permitted plants. They did very well.
I didn't initiate the banned book discussion but I won it!
for further context, did Comey perjure himself?
-
Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said:
He doesn’t give any specific citations up to the point I had to stop. Why not original link on a statistician or author of a paper on replication theory? Save everyone time and put you in a better light.
your choice
-
1
-
1
-
-
45 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
He is the source. Why not directly link to his primary source. I couldn’t bring myself to listen to a libertarian, Fox News economist.
you really should give it a listen so you don't respond in ignorance
-
2
-
-
18 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
So why would you use him to further your argument? By definition, you used appeal to authority fallacy.
because he clearly identified his source?
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Why would you consider him an authority on scientific research and then appeal to his authority?
See how this works?
He clearly identified his source. He didn't present himself as any sort of expert.
-
22 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
"up to". weasel word. when I have time I'll look up this persons expertise in these matters.
why would an economist be considered an expert on scientific studies?
Search Assist
Peter St. Onge is an American economist and commentator known for his libertarian views on taxation and government regulation. He frequently discusses economic trends in media and has been critical of federal income taxes and inflationary policies. Wikipedia
Overview of Peter St. Onge
Peter St. Onge is an American economist and commentator known for his libertarian views. He is a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation and frequently discusses economic trends and public policy in various media outlets.
my gosh, why would you consider him an expert?
-
8 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
yes. And logic is the best way to get there.
Not always, apparently
-
2 hours ago, Captain Hindsight said:
Unless Spencer Rattler jumps over Groot, we should be alright
I've jumped over a rattler before
-
16 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
lots of truth. we don't always find it. But it's there.
well then, you answered your own question
-
5 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
it's who you are. own it.
btw, I' d argue that your most recent answer to tibs was a red herring fallacy. We could make the entire forum into a logical exercise. wouldn't that be fun!
So there is no truth but you're calling out fallacies? Let me sleep on this and get back to you
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Roundybout said:
Im sorry you’re unable to see blatant quid pro quo corruption out in the open like this. Denial isn’t just a river in Egypt I guessI thought Kimmell was back?
-
18 hours ago, Homelander said:
You're going to take medical advice from this guy?
You think he wrote what he's reading from?
-
-
1 hour ago, 4th&long said:
I thought his ratings were bad? What Happened Maga? You lose!
You think his ratings are good?
-
7 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:
Great opportunity for Brady to get to know some of the players he’ll be coaching on the Saints next year.
Dude, this made me want to give every emoji response, all at the same time, all for different reasons!
-
1
-
5
-
1
-
-
Any concern about the visor causing some glare and vision differences for Josh? Simply, he's not use to it and IMO it has to cause some differences for him.
-
17 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:
Would free speech champion Charlie Kirk be in favor of firing people who spoke ill of Charlie Kirk on social media? Hmm ....
... Trump always seems to know how to cede the moral high ground within roughly 48 hours.
Probably not, but man, I tell you, before retiring I owned my own business. Ifone of my employees was out there saying shyt like this, it would most definitely harm my business.
-
1
-
-
Thursday night
OK, I'm being an ass. However, I will always be a guy that believes the next game is the next important game.
-
1
-
2
-
-
Fields isn't going to survive the season
-
1
-
-
Thursday night game...sit the starters
RFK In Charge of Health Care
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Hmmm, Fauci must have been lying