Pokebball

That's all you got? That's a pretty low bar. Now do NYC

Everyone holds biases to some extent. Bragg pursued Trump hard and he made that a part of his campaign for DA. I think it's pretty clear he had significant bias against trump, and clearly campaigned on it. What's your case against Cannon?

Here's what Bragg said, interpret that as you may... While campaigning, Bragg said: "I have investigated Trump and his children and held them accountable for their misconduct with the Trump Foundation. I also sued the Trump administration more than 100 times for the travel ban, the separation of children from their families at the border. So I know that work. I know how to follow the facts and hold people in power accountable." He also said that he would continue with Vance's investigation and hold Trump "accountable by following the facts where they go."

the jury in the DAs district would have. It's a moot point now, except for the appeals process

did anyone incolved in this case campaign on getting trump?

Venue changes, particularly, are done to obtain fairness. Given the DAs campaigning on getting Trump and the recent civil case, I don't think it would have been odd at all.

Venues and judges are changed all the time to achieve fairness in our judicial processes. Not necessary opining that either should have happened in this case, but fairness is always considered pretty important in our judiciary. Bias is always considered, both in fact and in appearance. Odd the powers didn't think either was necessary in this case. We'll see what the appeals process concludes.

So we've answered the "so what"! Making progress

They support both, don't they? Again, the ends justifying the means

So what? You don't think jurisdiction mattered in the case? You don't think the judge mattered in this case? Interesting

Or the federal election commission. And all of this in a jurisdiction that is not prosecuting some pretty serious crimes. This was clearly political.

This is the definition of the ends justifying the means

A vile criminal? Based on this trial? Like I said... The ends are justifying the means for you

I have to say that the response from either side was probably predictable, right? I'm sad for the state of our country today.

so go to the judge each time they have a question about the instructions?

this x 1000

Add it all up to achieve "beyond a reasonable doubt"?

Still peddling the bloodbath lie. What's that tell you about Kamala?

This is just the thing. There is enough truth and reality to hit Biden with. Biden's the one peddling daily lies. Come on man

always trying to "create" the news rather than reporting the news. And note this is one of the largest MSMs, ABC

Mine can. Mine can always be better

A mistake is to try to make this a Dem or Repub thing

Prejudices are what fools use for reason

Biden's above the law

blue shades