I think the answer depends on what you are trying to decide.
Mike Schopp, an analytics devotee, would never have selected Josh Allen because the analytics argued (nay, screamed) against it. The problem is, analytics can't measure or predict heart, commitment and the impact of vastly improved coaching.
The outcomes of in-game decisions, I think, are greatly improved by knowing the numbers/odds of doing certain things in certain situations.
In short, both analytics and gut have a place in practically every decision, but both have a place at the table.