So, to summarize:
- you agree with Belichick when he said he was wrong;
- it was bizarre for Goodell to destroy evidence yet claim he was objective;
- you agree with Goodell that you don't accept Belichick's explanation (except, I guess, the part where he said he was wrong since the thread title says you agree with Belichick's statements);
- you haven't heard anything from the Pats to dissuade you from wanting an independent investigation.
So you agree with Belichick's statements, except where Goodell disagrees with him. But Goodell's actions are bizarre. Got it.
I am getting dizzy trying to follow this, but I do agree that more investigation is needed. Great post!