[quote name="JohnC" post="3627409" timestamp="1439472315"
The problem that the league has is that they "over punished" (in my opinion) for a transgression involving his participation that has not been clearly proven. If the league would have punished Brady for two games, with a possible reduction to one game under appeal, their position would have been much stronger.
Question: why is the league's inability to "prove" guilt a fatal weakness in their position, when they have no subpoena power by which to obtain the proof, and when the "defendant" destroys evidence with impunity, explaining it away with a far-fetched explanation? Let's keep this matter on a level playing field.