Jump to content

TheWeatherMan

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,903
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TheWeatherMan

  1. Exactly, it’s a very bold win now move. They could extend to tack on ghost years to spread the cap hit but that would be unwise as well.
  2. No other team traded for a $50M AAV player and rolled 90% of their salary to the next year. Rodgers counts for more than $100M next year. Cap wise, the Jets are in the worst shape of any team for 2024.
  3. They’re 41M in the red for 2024. It’s possible, but I’d love to see them take on another +$20M contract. Jets have swung for the fences and are going to have to get very creative the next few years with their cap.
  4. Slot Receiver is a position. Why would you have a TE who is not good at blocking play the Y?
  5. Kicker, punter, long snapper, holder
  6. Exactly. By 2024 Allen will be paid like a mid tier QB. We’re in great shape for the long haul with our key players signed long term.
  7. Disagree, every tough team we play is on the road and closely scheduled (back loaded). The best teams we play at home are the Jets and Dolphins.
  8. There’s 3-4 games on at the same time, how can that be?
  9. Dallas, Philly and Chiefs games not prime time? NFL must not like to make money.
  10. Posters on here can’t even read / comprehend a one paragraph post before replying and you expect them to read an article?
  11. A compensatory 3rd round pick is virtually the same as a 4th round pick. If the Bears got a mid round #2 for Roquan, I suspect the Bills could have received something slightly less for Edmunds. I know hindsight is 20/20, but looking back, the right move would have been to trade Edmunds while on his 5th year option and used that $12.5M elsewhere.
  12. Sounds like the same concerns we had with Edmunds…every year.
  13. My guess is this is Morse’s last year. $3M dead cap but save $8M in 2023-2024. Minimal savings for this season.
  14. All of our away games minus Washington and Patriots are against quality opponents. Our home games are…not so much.
  15. But don’t you agree that your assessment is very short sighted? You select players based on standout plays and then assess based on ~3 games? In my opinion, your plan of assessment to include the collection of data (plays/stats), analysis/processing of that data (stats/data), and the exploitation of the data is all a very flawed.
  16. Thanks for the explanation. Sounds like a better assessment than what most members like @NewEra perform (exclusively highlight videos) but still not nearly as comprehensive as the analysis by sports reporters who do this for a living. So why should your assessment be regarded as reliable or in line with the professionals? Where’s the added value?
  17. Sounds like crowd pleasing to me…I digress.
  18. For credibility purposes, can you explain to the board your methodology for draft eligible player evaluations?
  19. So you’re afraid to express your opinions on a football forum, yet are quick to criticize others as having “dumb posts” etc? Sounds pretty weak to me pal.
  20. 2 elite talents in this entire draft? Id love to go back and see what you thought of the JA17 pick. 100% this.
  21. I think you say I think on average 4 times a post…not 100% sure but I think you do. On a separate note, this is about as captain obvious of a post as it gets. Zero added value here. What do you think?
  22. #2 by what metric? They aren’t top 2 in any statistical category. They scored 10 points in their final playoff game. I don’t care about regular season stats , if you suck in the playoffs…you suck period!
  23. They are ATTRIBUTED to him because he’s the OFFENSIVE Coordinator.
×
×
  • Create New...