Jump to content

cle23

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,417

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by cle23

  1. cle23
    And #35 because Brock Osweiler is that terrible.
  2. cle23
    Cleveland's last need is a guard. They have 2 very good, highly paid guards. It's Chubb, Barkley, or trade down at 4.
  3. cle23
    Couch could have been a good QB, he just got no help and a line that couldn't protect him at all. Manning probably would have sucked on that team.
  4. cle23
    It was a trade in some official mock draft that guys were live tweeting.
  5. cle23
    If Darnold is #1, just take him.
  6. cle23
    How about the Browns turning down Ditka's trade even though they were an expansion team in need of tons of help.
  7. cle23
    Hue Jackson all but said the 1st pick is a QB. They aren't trying to convince people they aren't taking a QB.
  8. cle23
    That's not how it works though. The 4th year option is based on the 10 highest salaries at your position, not by draft slot. The QB would garner a ton of money but I doubt Barkley would be $20 million. Either way, that 4 years of great play to figure it out.
  9. cle23
    Cleveland has a 0% chance of drafting Nelson with Bitonio and Zeitler. It'll be Barkley or Chubb (whoever falls) or trade down.
  10. cle23
    Having Taylor changes absolutely nothing about pick 1.
  11. cle23
    Rumor basically the same principle as has been tossed around. Buffalo gets 1. NY Giants get 4, 22, and a 5th. Cleveland gets 2, 12, 53, 65, 2019 1st, and possibly 56.
  12. cle23
    It took 3 2nds for the Jets to go from 6 to 3 but it only costs a 3rd to go from 6 to 4?
  13. cle23
    2 2nds this year and a 2nd next year.
  14. cle23
    Right, one was for a quarterback and one wasn't. There are premiums paid when trading up for a QB.
  15. cle23
    From 15? Is it 3 drafts worth of picks? David Johnson and Patrick Peterson?
  16. cle23
    Cleveland isn't desperate for a franchise QB?
  17. cle23
    I actually really like Mike White. If he drops to mid 3rd or the 4th, and I want Cleveland to grab him a la Kirk Cousins after Darnold at 1.
  18. cle23
    When I said 3 1sts, I was meaning if Cleveland moves down from 1 and 4, or the 1st pick outright. I'd try to trade 12 and 53 to get back to 6 or 7 for Barkley, Chubb, or even Ward.
  19. cle23
    I think the #4 would depend on the trade structure. It could be 12, 53, and a 2019 1st. It won't be 3 1sts though.
  20. cle23
    This board thinks trading to 1 is a possibility, and some think it would only cost 12, 22, 53, and a 2nd next year.
  21. cle23
    They generally downgrade a Pick the following year by 1 round. A 1st in 19 in worth a 2nd in 18.
  22. cle23
    I agree it's not enough, but who knows. I'd trade 35 and keep next year's 1st
  23. cle23
    You are crazy. I'll take Garrett and Chubb for 5 years and deal with contracts then. Bookend franchise pass rushers for 5 years is a great problem to have. No one trades much for a 30 year old RB, let alone a top 4 pick.
  24. cle23
    It would take more than a 1st next year a McCoy for #4. McCoy is a soon to be 30 year old RB. Take Barkley at 4 for that.
  25. cle23
    And someone doesnt take Barkley or Chubb. I think Denver would take either one at 5, and I think Indy would take them at 6 over 12 and a 2nd.
×
×
  • Create New...