cle23

Also, George Tanios was allegedly caught on tape spraying the chemical spray into Sicknick's face. That is assault, and possibly with a deadly weapon depending what the chemicals were. I think it was bear spray but I honestly don't know.

So they medical profession who performed the autopsy isn't allowed to speculate as to what caused the death? It's not like he is blindly guessing. He is using past experience and years of training/expertise to form an educated opinion. His chance of being correct that the events led to his death are astronomically higher than your chances of winning the lottery. Also, no one was charged. So what are you arguing? For Roseanne Boyland, isn't it now your speculation as to what caused her death?

Natural causes as described is that he he was not killed directly by protestors. He died of naturally occurring things in his body, but those naturally occurring things can be a result of the stress and things of the day. Also, the medical examiner is the one who said the events of the day (the stress/anxiety/pressure) of the day likely contributed to his condition. So yes, I will take a licensed medical examiner's expert opinion on the matter over Julie Kelly's. Everyone and their brother knows what Kelly is implying when she says only Trump supporters died, and that it needs investigated. Don't play dumb in that situation. Saying only Trump supporters died during the protest is a statement of fact. It's adding that it "needs investigated" that causes the disingenuous nature of her tweet.

Enough with the "murder" crap too. If you are in your home and I am coming into the broken door/window like Babbitt was, you wouldn't shoot? Because I would.

That depends on what your opinion on Brian Sicknick is, but he is a law enforcement officer that died that day. He did not die from a direct attack, that is now proven, and was obviously incorrectly reported at the start. He was sprayed with chemicals, so he was assaulted. He died from 2 strokes, and the medical examiner said it was natural causes, but that can mean a lot of things: The Chief Medical Examiner, Dr. Francisco J. Diaz, told the Washington Post that there was no evidence that Sicknick was injured or had an allergic reaction to chemical irritants. Due to privacy laws, he declined to say whether Sicknick had a preexisting medical condition. Diaz noted that Sicknick had engaged the rioters and said “all that transpired played a role in his condition.”[1] According to CNN, some neurologists did not think that the strokes were natural. Stress and traumatic events can lead to a stroke. Based on media accounts, a forensic pathologist thought that Sicknick's manner of death could have been classified better as homicide, accident, or undetermined.[c][32] If the Capitol J6 situation doesn't happen, Sicknick is likely still alive. As far as Julie Kelly, yes, I think she posts anything and everything to try to "stick it" to the other side, and discredit them, even if it means she is being willfully misleading or straight up lying.

Probably because most medical examiner's don't answer questions on such things to random political websites that call in, especially when the investigation was still ongoing. As for if they did it against he mother's wishes, how would they know her wishes without contacting the family?

How many Biden supporters were storming the Capitol on J6? I went to a Thai restaurant and was shocked that none of the food was Mexican! And again, from your own artcile: Among the 1,160 pages of documents obtained by Judicial Watch is a Jan. 8 application to cremate Babbit’s body that is labeled "completed successfully." However, neither Judicial Watch nor the medical examiner’s officer could confirm Tuesday whether the entry meant the application or the cremation was successful. Oh.

From your own article: However, neither Judicial Watch nor the medical examiner’s officer could confirm Tuesday whether the entry meant the application or the cremation was successful. So they are claiming she was cremated in 2 days, yet admit they don't know what the request actually meant. Her own mother said she was cremated according to her wishes.

So you took the first point and ignored the rest. And yes, when someone keeps using Kelly as the factual side of J6, and she is very clearly 100% full of crap, then yes, I will "attack the source." How is that any different than you claiming everyone and everything related to J6 is corrupt on the other side? Look, I am all for looking at things from multiple points of view. Julie Kelly isn't that. She is literally the exact same thing you claim the committee is, just on the opposite side of the political spectrum. So constantly posting her crap and claiming it as fact doesn't help anything.

Go to her Twitter, or her website. Yes, she claims all kinds of off the wall crap. One of Ghosts links says that Babbit's body was cremated within 2 days against her families' wishes. That is false as evidence of the quote from her mother.

So because Julie Kelly claims something now, that makes her factual and everyone else is "lying about basic facts?"

#1. This Julie Kelly is as biased as it gets. I opened her profile from one of your other posts last night, and 95% of what she posts is conspiracy theory crap. Some may even end up being true, but that happens when you throw enough crap at the wall. Eventually some sticks. It doesn't make you right. Literally everything she posts is how corrupt Democrats are and how perfect Republicans are. How every investigation is a coverup for something else. All of her links are just right back to her own website. #2. Ashli Babbitt was seen on video climbing through the broken window of a barricaded door, while the Capitol police ordered her to stop and had his gun drawn. And she wasn't cremated against her families' wishes: After her death [on January 6 2021], Ashli Babbitt’s body remained in Washington for weeks while law enforcement completed investigations. Then she was cremated, in keeping with her wishes, and her remains were flown back to San Diego in February [2021], her mother said. Now, her mother maintains that she was "murdered" but she was not cremated against her or her families wishes. 3. Why are Capitol police suddenly corrupt? People fight tooth and nail to cover for police officers who shoot unarmed people all over because they "could" have a weapon, but suddenly when a group of thousands of people are storming the Capitol, we should just ignore that and treat them peacefully? Investigate the incidents for sure, but it's amazing how the narrative on police flips when they shoot someone you agree with.

Not even a remote chance of this unless there are a ton of injuries.

3 died of medical problems and one died while ignoring Capital police and climbing through the broken window of a locked door, on camera. What is there to investigate?

"There were no proven cases." "bUt tHeY DiDn'T ReAlLy lOoK HaRd!"

You do realize that a vast majority of pedophiles aren't gay, right? I don't agree with the extreme side of the LGBTQ community either that wants it injected into everyone's daily life all the time, but that is a pretty small portion. Most just want to live their lives like everyone else.

He had a great team around him, except the worst line in the NFL his whole career. They finally addressed it once he retired.

1 game wouldn't toll the contract. But either way, 1 game would never happen. His cap hit is $55M every year after year 1, so it's hard to say what they will do. The cap is going to explode, so they very well may do that, but reducing Y2 to increase the others isn't going to help THAT much.

I mean, I'm pretty sure they decided to put him on the cover AFTER he died.

Depends on you. I do every other year or so, but I always wait for it to go on sale. Amazon had it for $40 several years in a row, but not so much lately.

It's not just Madden, it's almost every game nowadays. The game companies are in such a big rush to get the games released that they always have tons of issues that they "just patch" right when the game comes out. A lot of new games will have a several GB patch the day it releases. My main issue with Madden has been the bugs and the make new things for franchise mode that are nice, only to get rid of them a year or 2 later for "improvements" that are actually not.

Yes. I honestly don't know the exact amount of games he has to be available for. I think it used to be 6 for a 16 game season. At 17 games, it may be 7, or still 6. There were similar rules for players holding out. They could technically hold out 10 games, play 6, and have their contract count for that year. No pay for the games, and fines, but the contract tolls at least.

No. It would count. His cap hit this year is only like $10M or something. Next year it jumps to $54M. If they suspend him for the year, or even a majority of the year, it basically gives him the same contract next year and essentially moves it a year down the road, so his hit next year would be $10M instead of jumping.

I thought I had seen somewhere that Allen was 95.

Yeah, I want nothing to do with Cam Newton. That would be pointless as he isn't a good QB anymore, and he comes with extra drama. If Watson gets 6 games or less, I think they stick with Brissett. The Browns' schedule is pretty weak the 1st 4 weeks, and I could see them going 3-1 or even 4-0 depending on Pittsburgh QB situation. The schedule gets a lot tougher after that though. If Watson gets 8 games or more, I could see them trying to add a QB, even possibly Garappolo. He can win with a good run game and defense, which Cleveland should have. Garappolo will depend on how desperate SF is to get rid of him. Cleveland has the cap space. I wouldn't give up a high draft choice for him.