cle23

He calls everyone snowflakes, then blocks everyone who disagrees with him. He also spouts non stop nonsense, then claims any post or news report that disagrees is a hoax. He's a classic troll.

Yeah, if Howard can prove to be very accurate, he will be fine. Stroud obviously is elite in that department, but Howard hasn't had a great track record there. I would assume that OSU's coaches are better than K-State's, so he very well could improve, but that will determine his ability to throw guys open.

That could be great, or that could be bad. Still depends on Howard, because if the guy is covered but "open", then you still have to throw it in the right spot for the receiver to make a play. Just throwing it to a covered receiver will lead to a lot of turnovers. Peyton Manning could throw to an "open" receiver and make a big play, and another QB may throw to the same "open" receiver and it'll be a turnover.

Ika is massive, but both preseasons where he played, he got mauled in the run game. Hard to make a team as a run stuffing 360lbs DT if you can't stuff the run. I don't think he was active last year at all.

They're going to resign JOK, but Jed Wills isn't coming back. Dude is average at best and going to cost a decent chunk.

That's my fault. I read back but didn't see this was old.

I'm not happy with the trade for Watson, wasn't then, and I'm not now obviously. But he had a fracture in his shoulder last year, not a strain. And he finished the game that it happened in against Baltimore, leading a 4th quarter comeback after being down big early in the game. Trash the guy all you want, he deserves it, but do it based on facts.

In my opinion, if the Bills rank top 5 in terms of passing production, it would be because Allen is throwing 50+ times a game. Allen is amazing, but none of his weapons outside the TEs have had steady production. Even Knox has been up and down, and Kincaid is coming off a promising rookie year, but wasn't a world beater (most aren't as a rookie). Not to say it can't happen, but rarely do players turn it on 5+ years into their careers.

From my post, who do I support?

God forbid people have any lives outside of their jobs.

It's not another discussion. The fact that these 2 are the only options is a vile disgrace to our country. There's no discussion to be had. Let's take 2 old, incoherent morons and make them the only options. It's pure idiocy.

Neither should be ok. The kids are there for learning and social interactions. Not all the extra stuff. Take your kids to church after school. Take your kids to the other stuff after school if you so choose. This isn't that hard.

And the right believes stories by a shady ex President who has a proven history of lying and cheating people for decades, many who are American workers, but suddenly he is out to help Americans.

Who says Chicago takes the trade though? They want to surround Williams with weapons.

He really can't. If he's proven the father and the mother is awarded support, he can't do much after that. Also, you're making an awful lot of assumptions here. He admitted he has 10 kids. Not like he is trying to say they aren't his.

Most states require employers to withhold child support.

A lot of the hype happened after the Senior Bowl, where Wilson was beating guys left and right. Before that he was kind of seen as a late 2nd round guy. He's kind of like McCarthy. Underutilized in an offense that ran a very percentage of the time. Hard to get a good read on guys like that. But the speed is there, and the hands.

If it is that prominent, it should be simple to prove. So show evidence. Not just a hunch. Not just a feeling. Show evidence, and if there is evidence, prosecute anyone and everyone involved.

I didn't say computer simulations are the same. Do I think they help? Sure. My point was, the testing that used to take months or years to do, now can be done much, much faster. DNA testing wasn't admissible in court until 1986 because it wasn't reliable. Now, we can have testing done in days, or a couple week at most and with extremely high accuracy rates. We have more evidence of what components of vaccines and such will have lasting effects. Again, that isn't to say it's 100% completely foolproof, but to compare testing and research times from 40 years ago and then say that today's stuff isn't as accurate or trustworthy because they didn't take the same amount of time or is also not accurate.

Why's that? What makes the odds against them?

4 decades ago, we didn't have the science or the testing capabilities that we do now. How were computers 40 years ago? Televisions? I am not saying to follow everything blindly, but the idea that things today take as long as they did 40 decades ago is ludicrous.

I'm not pro-Hamas. Not a lib either. But Israel commits acts of terrorism just as often.

Israel, while an ally, is also essentially a terrorist organization at this point. We shouldn't be supporting either one.

So if it's indoctrination you want, it's ok? I don't agree with any type on either side. Teach kids the facts: math, language arts, bring back the life skills classes, and history, then let them make their own decisions. We should probably add a few more life classes, such as accounting and money management as well, because the country is sorely lacking. But Musk has proven to be very political, so what makes you believe he won't push his politics? Maybe he won't, and that would be great. But saying his is "Real education" given his political push at least makes me wonder.

No, it's not. Just funny that arresting a wanted criminal at the border is somehow used as a negative about border security. So it's a negative if they get through, and also a negative if they get arrested? I've got no horse in this race. Trump was awful. Biden is also awful. They want our eyes on the border, or anywhere else besides DC.