cle23

Fake outrage much? I pretty much guarantee that every one on this site has sped, and most have probably went 100+ or close to it. Is it incredibly stupid? Absolutely. Does that make him a bad person? Not necessarily. If the animal wasn't hit, then Garrett is legally responsible and will be cited. If the animal is hit, likely he would still be responsible but it can vary as well. But that doesn't mean he lied about it. They can tell pretty quickly whether you were speeding or not, so it isn't like lying about it would help anything. You get cited either way. Garrett does a ton of work in the community and a ton to help kids and such. He made several poor choices driving recently it seems, and he needs to correct them. But stop with the "he's a garbage person" because of this. No drinking, no drugs, both people with seat belts on. Everybody has some bad to their name.

Right, but I am saying you can't just change it because it may happen. Is Florida typically very hot in September? Sure, but It was 88+ in Ohio a week or so ago too. If the temperature is insanely high, I get delaying the game until later that day or the evening, but you can't change how the entire 32 team schedule works because a couple stadiums could be hot, or cold. Weather is a part of football and it always has been. Rain, heat, cold, snow, wind. It's all part of the game.

He didn't take "two steps" though. He did get 2 feet down, but he didn't take 2 steps then. But if Davis had fallen over without the defender and lost control on the way to the ground, or even when hitting the ground, it's not a catch. You have to maintain control through the catch. He caught it with 2 feet down, but immediately had the ball slapped out. I like your second statement here. If that exact thing happens at the 50 yard line, it's incomplete and not a fumble.

So no home playoff games in Buffalo in January? But the weather is part of the game. So no home games in Mami or Jacksonville in September? Carolina? No home games in Green Bay or Buffalo in December or January? There are 32 teams to account for. You can't make the schedule purely based on what may happen.

It's not a drop, but it's certainly not a catch either. He didn't possess the ball long enough, and wasn't able to complete the catch as the defender pulled it loose. That isn't a catch, ever, and 100% would have lost a challenge.

But weather does play a factor in football. That's been the case forever. And the way it should be. You can't schedule games around whether or not the weather may affect one team more than another.

Targeting is a college rule.

Claypool is about as self centered as they come. He's an idiot. Immensely talented, but to me, not worth the extra that comes with it.

I don't think he had any clue he was injured. It was hurry up, and he was laying on the guy's legs. Obviously not intentionally looking back, but that does happen a lot when teams try to delay the ball getting snapped to run more time off.

They play Cleveland on Thursday night, so the long week may have them do it before week 4.

They reversed that call. Threw a TD the next play.

I'm assuming they were thinking he lost a lot of weapons, so he would panic. Obviously that didn't happen. Dumb game plan for sure.

For what?

Rosen played against 3rd and 4th string players, and he was awful even then. Pretty sure he was under 50% completion for the preseason.

Her lawyer is trying to pressure the local PD to do something, same as the Watson situation. Araiza has nowhere near the capital that Watson has, even before the contract, so looking at it as a money grab is much less likely, plus, she claimed to not know him when she went for the rape kit. The local PD and university sat on this for 7 months without even investigating it. Forcible gang rape is much worse than anything Watson was accused of (not that what is was accused of is ok), but it's amazing how many people have changed their tune when it happens closer to home.

Yes, those things can happen during consensual sex, but rarely do women then tell everyone it was rape, and go to the hospital for a rape kit just for the fun of it.

Investigations are fine. Rand Paul is still an idiot.

Hated by who though? The Watson will be in play, but the players won't hate Cleveland more for the contract. Do you think the players will hate them more for doing something that, in the long term, will positively effect every NFL player?

Poyer wasn't terrible in Cleveland. Definitely not what he became in Buffalo, but when given consistent playing time, he performed pretty well. They just changed coaches so often that he got passed over a lot.

Simply saying " mail in ballots aren't secure" is not evidence though. If there is evidence that fraud occurred, then show it, prosecute the people who did it, and move on. If it is shown that people orchestrated it, then throw them in jail as well. There is fraud in almost every level of everything. Not a lot anyone can do to completely prevent fraud. But just shouting "this is fraudulent" without then showing that it actually was isn't the correct response either. Would it have been fraudulent if Trump won as well?

Yet investigations by BOTH sides have returned no major instances of voter fraud.

If it's that simple, then show the evidence. Because so far, it hasn't happened. Trump is what, 1/76 in lawsuits regarding the "stolen" election.

The sane statute he quoted in one of his previous posts does not say what he claims it does. It does give the President authority to declassify things as he sees fit. It does not say anywhere that they can declassify things through actions (sending them to his own home) alone.

Yes, the President has the power to classify and declassify as he see fit. But there are still processes in which he needs to do it. He can't just say "I declassified those" after taking the documents and getting caught. And they are not his property even if he did declassify them. Again, without knowing exactly WHAT is in these documents, you can't say that it is ludicrous. If it's some random historical document with no national security risk, then absolutely it would be ludicrous to raid a home for that reason. If it is top secret nuclear research/weapons as has been suggested, there would be nothing ludicrous about it. Right now we are all speculating, but I highly doubt a judge authorizes a raid of this magnitude if there wasn't at least decent evidence of Trump having something he should not have. But time will tell.