cle23

Which "quality" O line are you signing for $3M each? Rookies you can get less than that, but you aren't signing a quality veteran for $3M. The 28th highest paid veteran guard is the 1st to go under $4M per year, and none of them are starters.

If that is at all what you got out of my post, you have reading comprehension problems. Please, show me any LGBTQ groups outside of the fringe that supports pedophiles. Pedophiles are sick, and need to be institutionalized or imprisoned if they commit any act against a minor. If they haven't acted, then obviously just like any other crime, you can't arrest someone just because. Hell, if they haven't acted, then most people probably wouldn't know who was who in that regards. I wasn't supporting MAPs or anyone else trying to harm a minor. I was showing that anything happening between consenting adults (LGBTQ) is fine in my eyes, as opposed to MAPs and pedophiles because minors, who are their targets, cannot consent, therefore, it IS harming someone, and especially a child. That is definitely not OK. And MAPs, trying to lump themselves into the LGBTQ community of consenting adults is also not ok. Trying to imply that I said ANYTHING else of the sort is also not ok. Nice try though.

If that's what you want to tell yourself. Trump's following is unlike any other in the US history. It's not the norm, and most people don't behave that way for politicians. It was like a sports team fanaticism. I would say Obama has some of it, but never to the extent that Trump did. I still see Trump flags all over my area (rural Ohio) and the guy has been out of office for over 2 years.

I think the #1 thing here is, WHY was there any live ammunition on set? I think the investigation has to start there.

Just because people don't feel the need to scream it from the rooftops, or have MAGA hats, or have TRUMP/BIDEN flags everywhere doesn't mean they don't support their candidate. I didn't vote for Trump or the Democratic nominees in either of the last 2 elections, but if I had, no one would know either way as I don't feel the need to tell everyone I see.

In that scenario, you have very little leverage because he will command a huge salary and draft picks to get. Teams know Buffalo can't pay him $20+ million a year, so they really can't risk him being on the tag. He's not top tier elite where people are willing to drop money and picks.

You said that given the same circumstances Allen would have put up 55 points and Burrow put up 27. Do you truly believe that Allen is 28 points better? I think Allen and Mahomes probably have the highest ceiling with Burrow being very close behind them but Allen has by far the lowest floor because he turns the ball over a lot.

You're greatly overestimating Allen. He's not better than Burrow. Especially not twice as good.

Come on now. There's a pretty good argument for Burrow over Allen. Allen is great, but don't act like Burrow is a bum. Burrow had a hobbled center and was missing 3 other starting Olineman. He has better WRs for sure. But Allen is much more mistake prone.

Jones is hurt. He wasn't a healthy scratch.

Bit on the fake screen, not the run.

Yes, most QBs struggle in really bad weather. Purdy hasn't just been "good." He's been sensational. The highest rated QB in the league since week 11 when he began starting. That's insane. Do I think he's the best QB in the league based on that? Absolutely not. But it's not just "lack of tape" either.

Would contract consider that though? Fields plus a boatload of picks > Jackson and a huge conteact.

I somehow missed that this was suddenly 7 pages long and it was already addressed, so I called myself out there too!

Troy Vincent isn't part of the NFLPA.

Go ahead. Please show me where I said anything remotely close to that.

It says NOWHERE that the Russians had no impact entirely. It says that the Russian troll accounts on TWITTER had no impact. Those are 2 different things entirely. You are stating they had no impact at all. The articles you posted says the Twitter accounts had no impact on the election. Twitter is obviously not the only avenue to take in this situation. So either you didn't read/understand fully what it said, or you are trying to mislead people.

Your own article says that there was no impact made by the Russian accounts on Twitter. Not that there wasn't Russian interference, but that the Russian troll accounts on Twitter did not impact the elections. From your own article: "Citing a new study, the Post reports that there was no appreciable impact made by Russian “trolls” operating on Twitter during the 2016 election." The "trolls operating on Twitter" had no impact. I am not arguing that there was a bunch of Russian interference because I haven't seen enough evidence one way or the other, but your post is really misleading too.

3 years in a row Joe Woods would play zone coverage nonstop while Cleveland's corners excel in man to man. He always would switch with like 5 games left and the defense would improve tremendously. I don't fully blame him for the run defense though because he was saddled with crap DTs.

With an odd number of playoffs teams, that isn't possible.

Billionaires are all about efficiency. Show me a haircut more time efficient than that!

It isn't opinion. 8 of the top 10 states for federal funding deficit are Republican states. Kentucky alone received $26.6B more in federal aid than they pay in federal taxes, almost $6,000 per resident.

Who cares about public? Is that really the requirement now? And again, we have no idea if that would be a Democrat or a Trump thing, because Trump wouldn't give Democrats credit for anything they did do. The dude was an "expert" on everything, the "best" at everything, and took credit for everything he could, even if he wasn't involved. I doubt his partisan hack ego could allow them to show up together.

First Step Act of 2018 is one for criminal justice changes. And your criteria isn't necessarily showing great Republican "bipartisanship" as you seem to believe. Trump was also as partisan as it gets, and tried to withhold emergency federal funding because it was to a Democratic state. So it wasn't always Democrats refusing to work with him, though it obviously goes both ways there entirely too often. Both parties are garbage, everyone knows they're garbage, yet we sit here and argue about whose garbage smells better. And we draw lines over who has the best garbage while the parties are the same damn thing painted different colors.

McConnell's Kentucky is one of the welfare capitals of the country. Of course he is going to support another federally funded infrastructure project in his own state. Kentucky receives 215% more federal funding than they pay in. This isn't some great "bipartisan" plan. It's Kentucky with their hand out, like usual.