cle23

They're predicting $5.2M for a 10.5 sack guy? In what world?

Yes, but the first is next year, which greatly reduces its value. If it was this year, that increases the value. Also, while Garrett wants out, he also doesn't have a lot of leverage. If he sits out, he would lose out on $25M+ in salary, plus he could lose out on previously paid bonuses, so it would get very costly.

This is the most accurate statement ever posted in the forum.

2 late 2nd rounders, and a 1st the following year? Which essentially equates to another late 2nd rounder. Even if they end up with late first rounders, that's the difference of 30ish picks. A world of difference in the players available.

There is a zero percent chance he is traded for so little.

I agree it's highly unlikely. Just a scenario that Florio mentioned.

Mike Florio had a somewhat genius idea if including Watson in a trade of Garrett and reducing the compensation for the contract. Washington is about the only one who could afford it.

The only issue there is the return for Cook will be lower because teams know he is looking for the huge contract too. Giving up picks AND the huge contract to a RB isn't common. Who knows though, the RB seems to be making a bit of a come back.

Absolutely. I didn't like the trade at the time, and I never could have thought it would go THIS bad. The FO will take the hit for it, but Haslam had to keep upping the guarantee. Just plain stupid. Otherwise, Berry has been pretty decent. Not spectacular, but has has quite a bit of success.

The Watson trade was all Haslam.

Graham is likely going top 5, worst case top 10. Grant will likely be top 20, possibly higher after the combine. They're both monsters.

With what? And how do you afford both? Garrett is getting a new contract from whoever trades for him.

The right side of the line clearly moved.

No way he lasts until late 2nd. I honestly think he goes mid 1st.

If you get either Garrett or Crosby, you won't have a 1st find pick.