formerlyofCtown

Bortels? You know that is two teams that chose Peterman over McCarron.

Cole Beasley says watch the tape.?

I wasnt responding to that. I was responding to a comment on NE always trading down. The quality of player youre getting in the top 10 is likely much better.

One of these would be sufficient IMO. Ziggy Cook Ajayi

I wouldnt hate it, but the value doesnt quite line up for me. If the FO thinks he can be a perannial ProBowler then so be it. But that is what I expect from a top 10 pick. (He doesnt have to actually make the PB just play at that level)

Most money didnt matter to Brown last year. Cole Beasley would like you to watch the tape.?

There is no Josh Allen experiment. Hes a bonified QB. How often does NE has a top 10 pick

If it happened it would likely be ammo to trade back into the first. The OP did mention that.

Was Sheldon Richardson a FA last offseason? Like I said he got market value. I will admit I would have prefered Richardson, but he wasnt available that Im aware of and I would have prefered less gauratees and length. Although I agree that posters overplay the characted card. I agree that if he wasnt full go then he doesnt fit our mold. However at this point that is just hearsay.

We will likely employ packages as to who handles what concepts best. Who gets the ball will likely change based on the matchup.

Well if thats your expert opinion color me unimpressed. What Star got paid was market value. The DT youre looking for gets 16-20 mil not 10mil (Unless you draft him). If you think he is overpaid then you havnt been paying attention to the contracts that have been getting handed out the last few years. As for drafting Harrison to be Kyle's replacement, he actually plays the same position as Star but thank you for showing us how much you pay attention to DL play. That shows us how qualified you are to evaluate such things.

Yup? We have a rotational player getting 50 mil over 5 years? Or do you think we should draft a bunch of 7th rounders since we use line rotation. You ppl are way to hung up on starter /non starters in a D that has line rotation and an offense that will have WR packages based on route concepts Lol.

The only ones that need more work on their player evaluation skills than the national media are some of the posters on here. Im not saying he is or isnt going to be here. However, if he shows improvement from last season to the end of camp then he isnt going anywhere. You have no idea how much he has improved over the offseason as a young still developing WR. Its really a foolish statement for someone to make.

He already is, he made several last season.

Or maybe he will improve even more this year than last and surprise all the doubters. Year three is the bench mark for WR developement afterall. Hes seen him naked.?

I dont see why they didnt just try to trade him. Im sure Gruden would ick him up for a 5th rounder. Oh wait...?

You do know we rotate our DTs right? If we dont sign or trade for someone then expect a DT in the first.

Nathan Peterman

Gruden as well.

Wouldnt mean we were going for Hock. We would be going for BPA.

Unfortunately where I live they may be one of the best.

Oh so he's on here under a different account.

I hear there isnt much of a market so they may have to settle for that nasty crap from CiCi's

Is that one of our new OL. Sounds like a Rex guy. I havent seen Yeezus in a bit. Did he ascend into hell.

Because we should be focused on our "little jobs".