formerlyofCtown

I actually like all the OL additions They have all graded well at some point in their careers. Our new OL coach was a common denominator for two of them. Although I think he was the TE coach with one of them.

We do have that luxury now. Maybe trade up to six with the Giants.

I wouldnt take any of them at six. Murray and Lock have a chance to be successful but Im not that impresses with Haskins. Murray doesnt seem to have some of what I look for in a QB when I listen to him speak. He reminds me of Geno Smith but a little better than that. Lamar Jackson was the same. That doesnt mean they cant be successful it just means they dont completely have those it factors.

Cole if you are going to be on here just use your real name. No one will believe its you anyway.

Finally Penn and Teller

He does mask some weaknesses but they run the ball pretty well for having a bad OL.

I guess LaAdrian is close to Adrian

Or he doesnt pull the trigger because we are in good shape and a trade at this point doesnt make sense. Julio maybe. But he obviously doesnt want to pay what has been asked for what is available. Julio is a non headache addition.

The problem is there was a nice pocket for the QB to step into. Kyle played well last year but not what he used to be. Under Schwartz and even Petine a QB could forget about steping up into the pocket because it was gone. We need a rotation at DT that is a constant threat to colapse the pocket. We need a true penetrater at the 3Tech. I know from in an interview after last offseason that Beane said the Dline was not where they want it to be. They want it to be the strength of the D. You can have a Strong secondary and it wont make up for an ok DLine. However a Strong DL will cover deficiencies in the secondary all day long as long as it is an ok secondary.

I think that is what I said in my original reply wasnt it. Wow whats it like working in the Bills front office. Players get assigned a grade and if that players grade fits that slot then he is BPA. Unless its a bad year and there isnt a guy left that fits that grade.

They do not. They dont have time to do that. If I feel like it I may try to find an article that I read on how it all works, but Im kinda getting sick of doing what ppl should do themselves. Some are appreciative but some still want to argue. There are around 300 players on the their big board my friend IRC. They have met with one QB. Go ahead and look who they have met with and who they will meet with and it will tell you all they need to know.

All-Pro means he was the best in the world at his position bud. His numbers were on par with that season until Rex and if Jim Schwartz remaind DC I believe he would have made AllPro again. My credibility is education bro. And since you are going so hard on this with no statistics toback it up and dont even recall bringing up Mario earlier shows me you are not credible and are a waste of my time. You are just going off the authors numbers and are not even acknowledging or taking note of valid points.

I dont think Cousins sucks. He isnt a QB that elevates the play around him. He needs help to win a championship.

Pretty spot on. If the right guy comes along I think they will sign him. Other than that I think they go to the draft, take BPA, and fill out the roster after UDFA signings. I dont think BPA means the highest graded player available. I think It means highest graded player available thats on their board. Do you really think they spend a whole lot of time scouting QBs when we are set. Other than QB I think everything is on the table.

If true we got a guy that actually wants to play the Pats twice a year.? On a more serious note, he can probably play inside at the 3Tech on some downs.

Its a legit number because it shows the ability to get penetration and to beat the blocker. The lack of sacks shows the imortance of being able to colapse the pocket

I believe if we get a penetraiting DT the sack numbers improve vastely as there wil be no pocket to step up into. No place to hide from Jerry anymore. We need another 3Tec.

I think the important part is they share the same plan as the coaching staff. No I think Whaley would have been better than he was if he was able to pick his own staff. However I believe this is probably the best FO we have ever had. Remember that the Coach had heavy input if he didnt hand pick the GM. This is a very important detail. I dont think Whaleys FO would have been this good either way.

Where is your response to Mario. I would believe 50-60. The author has no credibility because he offers no credible source and does not say how he arrived at that number. I believe some FOs have a higher hit rate than others. Such as our current FO which includes our scouting department. Guys are also signed for depth and to do things that dont show up on the stat sheet. The media will not account for that but The coaching staff and FO know. Did you know that 80-85% of authors just pull a number off the top of their head. Especially if it is an exact number such as 80-85%.

Why dont you put your money where your mouth is Alpha?

Mario was an All-Pro the year before Rex came. Rex ruined him and Dareus. Took away there desire to play. By bad GMs. You want to take a look at their draft records. The success rate isnt what teams would like it to be but not 85 percent failure.

Rothelisburger Maybe?

Had an All-Pro season the year before Rex came and played at a ProBowl level both years before that. Rex made that contract bad. A player doesnt go from All-Pro to washed up over one offseason.

Lol.? I think the OP is a little over-dramatic. I guess I get that way sometimes.

Yup Stehon Gilmore Robert Woods Ill include Jason Peters as the real case was Ralph didnt feel he was worth the money. Need I go on. Sometimes it is the case but not 85% of the time. I also thing sometimes the reason it didnt work is where they go.