Jump to content

RocCityRoller

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,572
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RocCityRoller

  1. He is no Daboll!
  2. What we need is more flags to spice things up! EDIT: or a terrible spot and a challenge
  3. uh oh Geno
  4. LOL Hackett
  5. That TE is no Tommy Sweeney 😉
  6. what is this play where a guy kicks the ball very far to the other team on 4th down??? Wild stuff
  7. It is Nate Hackett
  8. yet he who laughs laughs best! 🤣 EDIT - Williams got in on the fumble action too.... what a mess
  9. Joe Buck stole all of your notes and just said them 🏆
  10. Is J Williams hurt, or is Hackett just a moron?
  11. Why was that not a handoff to Javonte Williams? Coaches get too cute Tennessee called me and told me to raise you a Simmons tackle on JA at the same spot
  12. You jynxed him! 🤣
  13. Drew Locke couldn't win with this type of offense? What exactly is Russ adding?
  14. Javonte Williams is a beast No Vic Fangio?
  15. Nate Hackett, Ron Darby and M Goodwin? It's like a high school reunion where you realize your taste in dates used to be terrible.
  16. suck on that River Monster fans! That had to feel good for Russell after being booed out of the tunnel.
  17. this game is setting passing back 20 years.... Trent Edwards is even bored
  18. Won't be able to see it on the Seahawk uniforms! 🤢
  19. Seattle's uniforms are horrible. They look like split pea soup
  20. Lewan played ok. Not great, not a liability (in general) I noticed a lot of plays going to the right though. I also noticed the Titans OL really telegraphs passes vs runs the way they line up, especially Lewan's stance. I thought he had an obvious false start on the Titan's last TD. He got up out of his stance before the ball was snapped, but no call. There were a few of those non calls IMO. He did get blown up on a late critical 3rd and 1, where the Titans tried a run with their TE Okonkwo. Lewan was beat badly inside shoulder by the Giant defender who made a critical stuff on the TE.
  21. I thought it was obvious Thursday night. Long lean and mean looking. The whole DL looks pretty jacked and mean.
  22. Fair points. I think I was reacting to some general consensus here and around social media too. The Watson deal was just dumb, but it is going to be a factor in all QB contracts for the next year or two. Jackson passing on the offered deal was pretty bad IMO, but someone will pay him what or near what he wants. I could see Seattle or the 49ers being in play if Trey Lance has trouble figuring it out this year. Would be really interesting to see him in Indy too with Reich as a mentor and Taylor as a compliment.
  23. Confirms my eyeball test and the box score. I started a thread a few days ago about Boogie. He looks really fit and continues to produce wow plays on limited snaps. Credit to Epenessa who was making plays too. Amazing what happens when you have DTs doing their job and add a game wrecker on the opposite end of the line.
  24. The Giants had a good scheme. What is impressive is that they did that without their two best edge players! I watched most of the game and some breakdowns this morning. They lined up their DEs wide and crashed the middle. It made for tough sledding for Henry, and limited the lanes Tannehill had to pull the ball down and run. DE Jihad Ward was lined up wide a lot, almost LB position, or like Lorax used too, and had himself a heck of a game. Doesn't hurt that Leonard Williams and Dexter Lawrence were doing a good job inside. Will be a good test for Jones/ Settle/ Oliver and Phillips. If Oliver is good to go and the game stays close, I would not be surprised to see Phillips get fewer snaps and see Settle/ Oliver get more. Am hoping that McDermott will use a 4-3 scheme or a 3rd DE lined up wide, and clog up those running lanes. I don't want to see Poyer/ Hyde/ Johnson be the first Bill laying a helmet on Henry or Tannehill again. If McDermott and Frazier insist on sticking with a 4-2-5 they should line up Von Miller or Rosseau wide like the Giants did with Ward. I also expect to see Lawson active and help set the edge wide or not.
  25. Lamar is definitely a polarizing player. But if the measuring stick is going to be Mahomes/ Allen/ Rodgers or your QB sucks, then there will be a lot of QBs 'who suck'. I do think Lamar was overhyped early on, and I do think he is not a great natural passer, but to deny that he is a play maker is silly. The league is moving to mobile QBs. Allen/ Jackson/ Hurts/ Lance/ Fields everyone is looking for a mobile QB who can beat you with arm/ legs and brain. Some guys will find success and some won't. Even guys like Tannehill/ Mahomes and Rodgers have enough wheels to get out of trouble or gain yards on the ground if the defense gives it. Tannehill/ Mahomes and Rodgers are football IQ high enough to make teams pay for leaving running lanes. No one should need to have to remind Bills fans about Tannehill's running ability, and he is a level 2 or 3 runner. I watched some of the BAL vs Jets game yesterday. Jackson looked refreshed and pretty crisp. He is running less with each game. He may never be the passer that some other natural passers are, but he doesn't 'suck'. The passes to Duvernay were beautiful passes to a WR. He hit some passes in tight windows and his legs caused problems. Everyone has an opinion, mine is that Jackson is a QB you can win with. Who knows wtf he is doing with negotiations? You can like a guy's ability without liking the player. IMO the league is pretty exciting now because of all the style of play we are seeing from QBs and the offenses built around them. Jackson adds to that mix.
×
×
  • Create New...