whatdrought

I honestly will be very disappointed if we trade that high, especially with a Division Rival. I'm not sure I would give a division rival that price for Aaron Donald. I'll support and trust the FO, but that will be a hit for me.

Based on what everyone else says, that would be a major overpay.

Please don't give the Jets a bounty of picks for anyone...

What was the other insider information you gave? ?

On April 25th, 2018: Section122: We all have our moments. Also, It turns out that @WRONG JOSH is actually that long time poster who said he would leave for several years if we took Allen over Rosen... He just re-branded. You can tell because in the above thread there are a bunch of posts by wrong josh, but when anyone else quotes them, the quote box says kdiggz

I just took a walk down memory lane and loved every minute of it... Also some good insights in here for whose opinions mean even less than the average joe around here..

So you're saying I shouldn't make an ultimatum that if we draft a player with the same first name of the player I want, instead of the player that I want, that I'm done with the team and leaving the board?... damn. there goes my night.

La Conshitshows tweet right before this is a retweet from some guy harping on the fact that Bosa is racist and likes white nationalist accounts without a single shred of evidence.

I rarely use looks as a gauge of a persons intellect, but damn, doesn't this guy have a Chili's bar to be prowling around right now?

Would I rather have Q. Williams, or Christian Wilkins and D. Samuel?

I just really don't want to trade up for anything that isn't a QB.. I feel like that backfires far too often.

Honestly, if Kyler Murray IS an option for the Cardinals, then he is THE option or else they're even more mismanaged than I thought... You don't just think about taking a QB with the first overall pick. Either you need a QB or you don't.

Yes, but give me someone other than Metcalf. Though he is more bearable at 20, as opposed to at 9.

# 9 for #20 and AB! Wait...

That was my point. It’s a guide, but it’s a loose guide. All it takes is one GM whose got his mind made up and it kinda goes out the window. I think the problem with trade charts is that we’re putting objective values on subjective properties. So we can suppose, but at the end of the day, teams are gonna do what they want. My guess is that the actual decision makers who say yes or no to these trades, likely don’t care too much about the charts. They have mental charts.

I don't think so at all... You go from 9 to 14, get a #2 WR who fills a big need, and pick up an extra third. Then you take Hockenson at 14 if he's there, Williams if not. Day one is a huge success then.

It's all well and good, except that any pre-conceived idea of draft value charts is gone as soon as the draft opens.

You mean it's too much for us to pay?

Sanu and a three to move up from 14 to 9 seems like a fair deal. Sanu adds some physicality to our WR room which is desperately needed.

I have no idea who went who. Give me the best offensive lineman. ?

Dalton Risner, OT, Kansas st If he’s on the board.

Nah... just don’t mention us at all... we didnt aprove your representation...

This is a great example of irony.

Josh Rosen.