whatdrought

Youre comparing safety with governmental whimsy. I have nothing wrong with solor and I applaud you for utilizing it. That doesn’t mean the hovernment gets to dictate others use it. You made a free choice to invest some money to save some money- let others make the same choice. p.s. - I didn’t mean to say hoverment, but I kinda like it as a subtle dig, so I’m leaving it.

You’re an idiot.

Information is only important if you have the recourses to use it. No- according to tibs that was just some random occurrence. Not terrorism at all because it doesn’t fit the narrative.

Wanna put it to the test? You bring a pen and I’ll bring a sword. The real winners of a shooting civil war in this country is the Chinese or whoever comes to mop up what’s left. A real and true civil war would have to start with some big shocking thing like nuclear explosions, or an EMP- has anyone seen Jericho? It could be something like that.

Well, that’s an accusation about Trump and the accusation against Kamala is that she boned her way to the top.

She is valuable that way, but everything has a shelf life. If they can deal a big blow to the "youth movement" and have her bitching about Nancy and DNC on the way out, they'll take it.

I disagree. Parties throw money at races they won't win all the time. Example: DNC and Beto

The best thing for districts like that is candidates who tow the party line and don't make waves. Noisemakers draw attention from both sides which leads to way more investment and opportunity for whichever side is on the defensive (in this case, the RNC). Not to say she will lose, but it's more open than it once was- It's also going to be interesting to see how much support she has from Nancy and the DNC by then. Well if they start now it's just cause they're racist.

I'm still holding out hope that she jumps in.

https://www.opensecrets.org/races/candidates?cycle=2018&id=NY14&spec=N Her opponent spent the equivalent of a used Honda Civic on the election...

Not where it mattered. There are a lot of people that are going to vote for the blue either way, but the consensus going in was that it would be a landslide both vote wise and electoral wise. It was neither because the Clinton name isn't worth as much as the Dems. believed. That harkens back to my point about how I was surprised they didn't do away with them once and for all when they had that out.

You could say that again.

If you think so. I disagree but I know you've been pounding that angle for the past two weeks, so keep it up. Also, not sure if Kamala is your choice, but she has some skeletons In her closet that aren't great- as far as sweet deals go, don't forget her connection to Kimm Foxx and the Smullet scandal. There's plenty of mud on both sides.

I'm not deeply plugged into this story, but I thought Trump banned E from Mar-a-Lago? Yeah, that is true- I think the bigger issue is that the D's didn't push the Clintons out of the sphere of the DNC they way they should have been after the Clinton Empire got exposed as a House of Cards. It seems like some kind of Bill scandal was a matter of time. Well, That's how you see it and I respect that- My perspective is that the scandals have mostly been fabricated- there are moral problems i have with him, but a lot of the big stuff is contrived. IMO.

My mistake. I don't think any other attack on Trump has worked, and this one has even less substance than the others. (at least so far) Socialites party together, it's not a big revelation. Clinton on the flight logs 2 dozen times is a much bigger deal. And there are a billion other threads to be pulled on.

I don't think they are, but they could surprise. - If the dems were smart they would get out front on the four rookies and either get them in line, or get rid of them. Trumps tactics made that harder for them to do. Those four are driving the left so much farther left than is sustainable. Bernie was fine cause he was a cute old man who was never gonna be given anything and he knew when to shut up- these ones are a much bigger threat to the dems. I also don't think either side wants to embrace the Epstein story (as evidenced by how ignored it has been anywhere that isn't this board) It's mud for both sides of the isle.

I mean, he’s no Leodis McKelvin... but...

Looking back at the older threads I saw that you actually had something close to conversation skills then... you really have gone batshit crazy.

Breaking News: Tiberius is still a ######. I didn't even have to work hard to find this.

Cause for years republicans have played nice while the democrats have employed the “shout them down for being racist and bigoted” so they think it works, whereas Trump is like a super villain to them who actually gets power from their attacks.

I thought it was pretty good... My wife loved it and wanted to watch it several times... I really can't watch historical movies more than once, I mean, what's the point?

Got me there- Though I feel that's probably accepted as a well known colloquialism ala "I hate this music." or "I hate mushrooms," but whatever you say bud.

Who do I hate? If you're gonna accuse me of that, show some evidence? I don't even hate you- I may insult you for your lack of honesty, and how often you backdown from actual conversation in favor of being stupid, but I don't hate you. If you decided today that you wanted to actually discuss issues, and be open to conversation, I would be glad to do that with you. How long before she runs for office as a Democrat?

While party of hate would be an awesome band name, I'm guessing your accusation is that I'm a republican or democrat, which I'm not- you assuming I am just shows that you're a partisan shill who doesn't understand that there are people who stand outside of partisan politics and look at the truth, instead of whatever dick their chosen party tells them to suck.