whatdrought

I think there is a way for us to make it to the playoffs even if we lose out, but damn, I don't think I'd even want to be in the playoffs at that point...

Where are you getting that from? - Not arguing, just curious.

We seem to do well finding contributors in the second and third waves of FA, or at least among second and third tier guys. That being said, I'd be fine if they dropped a hefty sum on someone like Yannick Ngakoue from Jacksonville.

Does anyone know where to find the rule that you can't videotape the sideline or whatever is the phrasing on this?

exactly. If he was just doing what was perfectly normal, no need to delete anything. It's shady as *****.

This is what really drives this over the edge... They have such little regard for the rules, and such little fear of repercussions, that they're doing this when they realistically don't have to..

Why does that have to be included? If I'm not mistaken, they broke the rule by filming the bench in the first place?...

I read a report that they did in fact keep the original and give the league a copy.

What. the. literal. *****.

So it's only a problem to break the rules if you actually succeed in gaining a competitive advantage? This is BS. Make them forfeit the Bengals game. This is the second time and they aren't even sort of denying it.

Not to mention the poster boy of their NFL 100 team.... awkward.

we seem to be damn good at forcing 3rd and 7+

I get that. I honestly don't see why this team should scare us. Their defense is good, but calling a defense elite that has been playing who they've played lately is a stretch. Our offense has struggled, but we're not turning the ball over hardly at all and they live and die by turnovers. Our Defense will completely shut down everything they do and our Corners aren't going to get baited into silly PI calls when they know the QB can't get the ball there. Those PI's are some of the bigger parts of their offense. I don't want to sleep on them, I just think that they're by and large not much to worry about. We'll see if I'm wrong or not. Also, Our team plays better on the road, and our one "primetime" game this year was pretty good. I disagree about their defense being better. We effectively shut down the two best offenses in the NFL in back to back weeks. They've been feasting on the cardinals, bengals, browns, and other such teams.

It's cause they blew some teams out early in the year that have padded those stats. G-men x2, dolphins, eagles.

Essentially NJ is a ‘70’s key party of disease.

He went bowling in New Jersey... he’s definitely got several undiagnosed diseases.

I bet when news that their spy had been caught red handed made it to Foxboro there were some deflated balls....

So the advance scout’s advance scout was advance scouting with advanced scouting apparatuses....

BPA at the following positions: DE WR OL RB TE CB

Right, but I guess my thought is that even if josh has the exact same game this week that he did yesterday (seems very unlikely) and the offense can only score 17 points, I would still be surprised to see their offense do anything close to enough to overcome that. Also, the whole “who have you beaten” game is way over done, but it is fair to question what offenses the steeelrs have been shutting down. They gave the rams fits, but the rams offense was hot trash at that point.

I personally don't get it... this seems like such an easy game for us. Am i completely underrating the Steelers, or do people still not trust josh to do at least as much as he did this past sunday- cause Duck aint scoring 24 points on our Defense...

Essentially this is a slight amendment from the “if you win two you get a third” and says you get each challenge back that you win. I don’t care for it myself, because it would create a hypothetical scenario where you have a coach challenging 4-5 times a game. I think If they were going to consider this, it should be with a reduction to 1 challenge. You get 1. You win, you get it back. You lose, it’s gone.

We just need George Kittle.