RochesterRob

Why do I have a feeling that your take would be different if the liberals here were winning that battle. You say it is against the TOS and yet from time to time it is rampant over on TSW. Do those posters get called out on that? If ST could offer more than rants about "Covid Donnie" maybe he would receive less grief.

Secrets like that are hardest to keep. Trump has been a public figure more scrutinized than Biden over the decades even the times Biden has thrown his hat into the POTUS ring. If Trump was getting money from an illicit figure there is a high probability of that leaking out to the public as Trump has quite a number of enemies and has had for a long time now. Biden has stayed in the shadows because he has been considered a light weight. That the Vice President is perhaps the most invisible man in DC.

It (the moon) will be run by Martin Landau and his wife Barbara Bain plus a number of people with a British accent.

Your distinctions are as clear as mud. I don't have anything against you personally but your post is structured poorly for the purpose of discussing Hunter, the diaries, and so forth. #RochesterSchools? I did not attend city schools and lived in a district outside of the RSD. I have a Regents Diploma and ranked pretty well in my graduating class. Diary story becomes very important IF confirmed as it leaves people to wonder what Biden can be blackmailed over. Sleep over with the kids friends seeing daddy's open bedroom door? Would you want a person working for you if you knew they could be blackmailed and in the process harm your business? I don't mention it as a joke because I know people that have been hurt by such things. As to your post most teachers would not bother trying to sift through that guessing what you are trying to say. There would be comments off to the side about "I know you are trying to say something but leave doubt as to what."

Your jealousy is obvious. Anyways, you got a few more hours of picking up cans so you can afford the hookers in the red light district.

For what TFR would be trying to say in a diary thread? Hell yeah. I don't get down on people for not being professional writers but TFR needs to explain things better if he says the NYT piece does not pertain to the diary which seems to be the implication.

FIFY.

Why would you randomly post Hunter material when the topic is about the daughter's diaries. You : "OK, you made me look for it...................... One would only take it since you were in the diary thread that you would be looking for material concerning the diary. If you were intentionally wanting to talk about Hunter would you not start off by saying "I want to talk about Hunter" or "I want to pivot the conversation to Hunter?"

Re-read TFR's post as it is in big print. As I said it is possible that NPR did not retain the story for the purpose of archiving. Once again, ....offered by NPR's managing editor for news last week explaining why they were only covering it as a media story.... TFR post. Not mine. WZ once again retreats into the cave of intellectual dishonesty. If not to address the diary then why the NYT quote at all?

Gilligan!!!!!!!!!!

Ewwhhh. I want no part of that processing.

The NYT quote is suddenly in doubt? OK. As said before most media outlets don't have 100 percent retention on material presented. Can't imagine the resources required to archive 100 percent of material presented over many years.

No, you will be an inmate there. The rest of your post is just a liberal paranoid fantasy.

Read The Frankish Reich's post towards the top. It is in large print. ....offered by NPR's managing editor........ as to why they were covering it........... A transcript would offer full context of course which is not always possible by a simple link. Many such as myself listen to media such as what is presented on radio which is not always readily available for review.

Agreed that the diary should not be used without permission of the holder which has been unclear in this case. But it should be troubling that NPR touched it given the MO of the MSM of which NPR is a part of. So many things pertaining to the Biden's have been 100 percent off limits in terms of coverage to this point. Why even go near it if you are NPR? If there was a policy that was followed whereby an organization looks at everything and dismisses what they consider non-credible then it would be different.

Don't muddy the water. I could have posted any number of connections and you would have doubted them. I did not post a thread because I was waiting for more to be revealed. I was unaware until now that NPR addressed it even if not to validate it. Strange since the MO has been to black out any damaging Biden stories by the MSM. Why would they even acknowledge it (the diary)? Are they trying to get out ahead of something?

Too early to know the scope which is why I did not start a thread on it. Weird that NPR would give any light to this story given that they are in the tank for Democrats. Seems to me that NPR would be part of an effort to smother it. At the end of the day it mostly likely will not slay Biden but could be very damaging as this makes Biden prone to blackmail if it is true but yet resides in the shade.

RBG obviously ignored her education in favor of cooked polls showing the Hilldog with a big lead. Another example of a person letting their ego run amok instead of using their brain. I could see the pant suit queen issuing an edict like that.

You bypassed both because you know that you are losing the fight worse than you were on page 1. Give it up already. You know that there is material that can be easily googled. I would understand the need to link if there was not.

Convenient that you bypassed the rest of my post. Not that it was ever in doubt but you updated to the minute that you and your ilk (Q Baby using the word tard or Tibs casting an FU) use derogatory language and mostly while being on the offensive. Not that you ever had the moral upper hand but now you have definitely lost it. Again, this is all tiresome. There is material out there to view and judge the validity of. Asking me to prove is like asking me to prove that there is a sun in the sky. Either way you have to get off of your butt and go look.

How can I post news that has not yet been presented? If you want to read about the diary you can google and find hits then evaluate in terms of personal credibility. I'm not doing your homework for you when you were dumb enough to start a thread without checking things out for yourself. You obviously believed there was validity or you would not have started a thread.

Like you and your buddies when they spread talk of Trump having sex with minors? No. Why don't you use google and see the stories for yourself. Surely, you would rather read the source material than get it from a source you consider suspect or unreliable. You are quite tiresome. You need to improve your game to keep my attention.

You're right. I should not expect logic from you.

I'm not an insider so I can't tell you time or material. Puppet thumbs up another puppet.

Right there, WZ.