MrEpsYtown

But you have to take value into account. People are assuming this guy is a first round pick and he isn’t. Besides Chris Trappaso, Rudolph is not regarded as one of the top fifty picks in this draft. You just don’t draft a third round quarterback at 12 overall. You have to take rankings and values into account. You cannot simply draft for need. That is how you wind up with roster devoid of talent. They really liked Nate Peterman last year and they got him in the fifth. Imagine how we would feel if the took him in the second instead of Dion Dawkins or Zay Jones? That’s what all if these Rudolph fans are suggesting. So we are going to take the 65th best player at 12? Why? That’s just terrible process. I dont think 95 percent of the scouting communiy is wrong and Trappaso and a few people on a message board are right. That seems highly unlikely.

I think that is the huge question mark for them. If they aren't taking a QB and they aren't taking Barkley, there is absolutely no way they should not trade down. They only have something like 5 picks in this draft. The have issues with offensive line and are switching to a 3-4 defense so they can use the picks.

Good post. We are definitely not in a good position. The one thing that we can offer guys is playing time. Sometimes guys just want to have a chance to play.

The will find a way to screw it up anyway. Especially with that idiot in charge again.

Good stuff. Well said. Eh, Mason Rudolph would have smashed that door with a sweet deep ball. Baker Mayfield. Tyrod Taylor. Is that everything?

Man should have drafted Cooper Kupp or JUJu. Seriously though I really home Zay is okay and this is just an isolated incident.

Ah my bad. I hear you. I have no right to be thread police but the Hurns thing was like right there! Its all good.

Not sure what you are asking. But there are numerous threads here about recievers we are interested in so not sure what the point of this thread is. Thats all

This!

I appreciate the feedback and your analysis. My philosophy is that you need to draft potential high in the draft. Your last paragraph is 100% correct. However, if you can’t physically do it you can’t make it. There are number of really smart quarterbacks with weak arms. They are backups. With defensive players as good and fast as they are, you get guys with weak arms who are very smart throwing 5 picks in one half. Plus, while hand size isnt gospel, it is important in placea like Buffalo. Im passing on this class if I can’t get Darnold Rosen or Allen. I just don’t see the point.

I really feel like they love Allen, but i’d be shocked if they pass on Darnold

4.55 I think

Just confusion on the interwebs. Or maybe i’m the confused one

Haha yeah he might need a moment. I hope when he is wrong he comes out and admits his mistake. Probably won’t though.

He thinks you mean Dansby. You meant Fletcher.

I mean we can’t answer that because we don’t know anything about the negotations. We just know he is old. After contracts are agreed to, then we can compare. How can we answer this? It’s an impossible question. Asking impossible questions is how you win the internet.

Thanks! Somebody recently said I like to whine and complain, so to be called an optimist is an upgrade.

Thats because he is not a top remaining free agent. He is a free agent though. The Breeland thing is so strange. I’m not surprised by Gaines.

I mean there is a thread about interest in Allen Hurns that was just updated. And one about interest in Deonte Thompson.

Yep this. Maybe he sees the opportunity here, but he might be the guy with the Jets. Money always talks.

Mcdermott seemed to forget that last season

His release was weird. He was great in preseason for Chan, wins the job, starts the first couple of games, then cut. It was strange. It was like if we decided to cut Tyrod after that Godawful saints game.

Yep. I would say that us and the Jets would offer him a pretty much guaranteed starting spot

Makes a lot of sense. They have the cap and like us, the playing time.

Ah yes that’s right. What was i thinking?