Motorin'

I've seen so many players take their helmets off on the field this year and haven't seen one penalty called yet.

Yeah, it's stupid. But you can horse collar QB in the pocket bc he's not a runner.

You are allowed to pull a runner down by the jersey, but not the collar of the jersey. And by the rules, the hair counts as the jersey.

If I win the mega-jackpot I'd be very happy to donate the winnings to cover the cost of a dome, in return for 33% ownership of the Bills. Deal Terry?

That's entirely rational. Part of me wants the Jets to squash the Pats and cement their doormat status in the division. And then that just sets the Jets hopes up to be burst even more when we meet next week.

Jimmmmmmy!

I think the real question is with the recent additions by the Eagles and Chiefs, have they caught up to the Bills taken level? Bc let's be real, that why they both added players, to try to close the gap with us.

Lol, winning one game against the Steelers back then would have been huge!

So you're saying there still a chance!?!

I mean, with a peak into that kind of insanity that whole steez of the Bills social media team makes a lot more sense!

Did someone say shrubbery? Ni!

They would kill Alabama every year in the SEC! I think it is fun to watch too, it's very throw back.

Like throwing egg on the Mona Lisa, I guess.

He used to be more fun to watch. But I think he's getting more tentative taking off full speed. Getting hit a few too many times by NFL defenders will make you think twice.

"Lamar Jackson can sit in the pocket and throw it with the best of em." No he can't, not really, Herby.

1 percenter over there.

I'm just saying it will continue to get much less annoying as the ability to manipulate the apparent contrast ratio continues to improve. And it's really only an issue on sunny days, and since Buffalo only averages 54 sunny days per year (mostly in the summer) you've got that going for ya!

So the fake video recording paying on the fake Video board is from a different fake game than the fake game on the field?

Dark and light are relative. The human eye can see all of the color in shadows and direct sunlight at the same time just fine. Older cameras have less dynamic range that the human eye, so the contrast between shadow and direct sunlight is severe... Newer cameras have much better dynamic range than the human eye. So they can render all of the color in the shadows and all of the color in the highlights, making the contrast between the two much less. No more washed out sunny field or blackened shadows... And the signal can also be processed to increase the brightness in the shadows and decrease the brightness in the highlights as long as the camera can properly expose both highlight and shadows at the same time. Older cameras could only properly expose one or the other... And the most annoying thing ever was watching a game with the camera set to auto exposure, so the picture would constantly pulse between all white highlights or all back shadows.

It's the networks cameras, and they're locked into massive investments in older broadcast technology. 4k cinema cameras that have a million times better image quality are a fraction of the price of the old dinosaur tv cameras. The shots they cut away to on the field that look cool as hell are often freelancers with a $2,000 camera and it looks a million times better than the $500,000 camera shooting the sideline... But yeah, they need to get with the times.

There's still older cameras in use, usually for less important games. And as time goes on, they're only going to keep getting better.

Lol, sure. If you're taking your helicopter to the game.

That's really an effect from older cameras with crappy dynamic range. And yeah, that does suck. But it's a problem that's been fixed.

If you had read through this thread, you would have found out it was so people didn't have to read through 77 pages of the other thread to find the renderings.