Motorin'

Maybe, but you wouldn't have much to post unless there was something to complain about. Am I right? 😊

Only the Bills, but not the 5 teams they beat this year so far?

I think we'll see if Marlow is an improvement at some point.

He returned the Jets first punt for 18 yards. Looked dynamic.

Still wondering how much he paid yesterday for logo usage?

I'm wondering if there's hundreds of Eagles fans screaming on their board right now about their season being over if they get run on like this for the rest of the season? 😂

It was jitterbug, wuzn't it!

Mostly Iggles fans?

I wonder how much they paid them for logo usage this week?

Sounds like weez got yourselves a new Scatterbug!

I was literally on a plane last month where a woman was insisting that Chicago was instituting the Purge...

There's a place for cashless bail, and domestic violence is not that place. Ever. I personally think the Cheektowaga police were full of ***** pretending their hands were tied letting this guy go. In their press conference on this poor woman's murder they campaign for politicians who are against all cashless bail.

I watched the Cheektowaga police press conference on this. They said they couldn't hold him on bail bc he had not committed a felony. But it sure seems like he did. I'd love to know if they intentionally withheld the proper charges to stick it to proponents of cashless bail for small offenses.

Tell me you've never made a licensing deal without telling me you've never made a licensing deal. He pays for video footage, and explained on his show that he can't even pause it, because then it becomes a graphic. And his deal currently does not include the licensing of graphics.

Is it? Is he hosting a live show that charges a subscription fee and sells multi-million dollar sponsorships? And is his show able to generate millions of dollars due to the popularity of the league and brand in question? I like McAfee and his show. There's no chance he's a millionaire if his audience wasn't pulled from the audience the NFL created. He adds value, he's funny. But he's not the NFL, and so he doesn't have the right to use their trademarks in the creation of content that he charges for. Unless he pays for that right.

Oh boy. That's not at all what I've said, twice now. Maybe you should DM McAfee and offer to represent him in a Fair Use case against the NFL?

No, this is the part where if I'm wrong Pat McAfee gets to use NFL team logos without having to pay any fees.

I always think of this play when I think of Hines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndxPl1s84dk

I was absolutely going to joke that this was for Zack Moss and a 5th.

With all due respect, you are incorrect sir.

Too late, they won the Super Bowl week 3.

I didn't say being an entertainment show excludes you from Fair Use. I said entertainment shows don't have the same Fair Use rights as news shows. And his content is monetized, and the more views he draws the more money he makes. So using other companies' logos to make graphics for his is show is something he has pay for. He in fact is competing against the NFL Network for views, and the more views he pulls away from the NFL Network the less money they can charge their advertisers.

I think he took his helmet off after Wash called T.O. So that might account for the difference. Scary Terry sees the refs wave TO. No penalty during a TO break for adjusting your equipment?

The way McAfee was using trademarked logos to create original monetized content doesn't fall under Fair Use, and he's not a news organization. News channels have different rights under Fair Use than entertainment shows. And you're right, the NFL could issue a cease and desist to any content creator using NFL logos. I received one of those letters from the Bills legal team that forced a now defunct Bills fan site to change its name and stop using the Bills logo a long time ago.

Exactly, but in the segment where they told the audience that they couldn't use logos in graphics they took every helmet, poster, trinket off their desks that included a team logo. It was kind of funny. And to the original point, the 4 million was for highlight footage. They didn't say how much it would cost for logo use. It might be way less than the cost of the highlights. But it wasn't included in the highlights fee.