Kelly the Dog

How would we know?

In the lawsuit, she claims that the day after the rape, she had to go back to his place to get her stuff, and when she said we need to talk about last night he said, “You made me feel like a real rapist.” You cant make this up.

They met in a Bible study group. That’s beautiful.

She accuses him of rape once. The third incident. One rape

People can joke and ridicule and make wild ass assumptions. That is what this board is all about. No one is saying he is automatically guilty and should go to jail.

That’s pretty much the equivalent of first one to mention Hitler loses.

Who here is suggesting he go to jail without any kind of investigation and case?

You are doing the same thing you are railing against. You saying she did something heinous without knowing.

I don't know what happened either way but how are "alterior motives... clearly visible" here?

The innocent before proven guilty thing is not really the American way, it is the American legal system and court way. People have opinions about guilt or non-guilt since the beginning of American history outside of court.

I guess. Fair enough. And I'm not saying it isn't extortion. One of them is flat lying in an enormous way. He admits to the relationship. She says he forced her physically and seriously raped her. That is a serious charge. Who knows which is closer to the truth.

You mean after he lost 15m? If it were opportunistic, wouldn't it be when he got 30m?

Anyone got an AB-English/English-AB dictionary?

I think the story is sexual assault three times with one woman, including raping her once. That was the nytimes story I read.

He was never going to be lined up behind the QB, and he never was, because of what the Jets did repeatedly. He was always split out, and we always passed, and we always played 10 on 10 because he was no threat whatsoever. Again, that is the whole point. The trade off.

No, there is the same number in the box. The reasonable alternative to what they did, if they wanted to show run, look for the defense, and then split out and create mismatches is to play Tommy Sweeney instead of DIMarco on half of those plays. Put him on the line, read the defense, and then split him out. He becomes a threat in the passing game as well as a blocker, and he paid off with more good and important blocks in this game than DiMarco made, as well as a downfield reception. He blocked tremendously for his first game.

i'm talking about the grouping not after the line is set. With DiMarco in every play there is an extra LB in on every play. If he is replaced by a WR there is an extra DB. I would prefer that trade off, and it is the reason most every team goes 3-4 wide. The Pats like to use a FB but not 18 plays in a row. The Jets wanted us to do what we did and they think they won that battle, the stats say they did (counting turnovers) and the score surely said they did. We moved the ball pretty well and very well at times but their scheme was designed to force mistakes from the short passing game and that is exactly what happened.

No, it adds an extra linebacker and then eliminates him. That is my entire point. It's like 10 on 10. I would rather have the split wide and extra WR so Singletary has more room to run, which is what happened later.

I never looked for a job

Yes really. My original point was precisely BECAUSE they checked out of called runs. I didn't fault Josh for doing it. He made the right call because the Jets didn't change. That was precisely my point. I didn't like the trade off. I like DiMarco. I like the idea of having him in at times and even splitting him out at times. I didn't like the one dimensional trade off the entire time. And if you like an offense with a no threat fullback split wide forced into all short passes with no run game versus a three dimensional one with a run game, short and deep passing game have at it all day. The Jets told us before the game what they were going to do and then they did it. They were going to make Josh beat them with a short passing game planning on him making mistakes. That's kinda what happened. I don't think he was totally at fault but they were still all mistakes. When we took them out of that idea we succeeded.

I did read all of that actually and still feel the same. There are some advantages but the fact is the real effective offense the Bills had was the one back, three wide one that featured a run game with Singletary and a downfield game with Brown as well as a short passing game. It’s almost inarguable. The DiMarco offense was limited and needed 10-12 play no mistake drives.

I'm a believer that 33-50% of all back shoulder throws are actually front shoulder misses.

Buy the Bn Blitz. It costs one half of one beer a month! That will be a community service in two ways!

You get to quote Jarvis Landry once. Maybe. Otherwise you were bang on. Josh is a gamer. You want him to improve, be more accurate, take what is given, use better fundamentals, take better care of the ball, and most importantly win games. He did five of six.