Kelly the Dog

I understand and respect your football acumen too. But... to me, there is literally zero chance he is able to reach the ball out to the endzone without full control. He brings it in. That's what makes it a catch and different from other calls and proof, to me, that he has total possession. I would say that without question if it were a Dolphin who made the same play. He showed proof of possession by bringing it in. Then and only then did he push it out. If anything it was a fumble he recovered.

I think this one was way different. I understand how there are different arguments over what is a catch. But both live and on replay you can see him clearly catch the ball, bring it IN, showing possession and only then pushing it out to the endzone. The bounce on the goaloine or close doesn't matter. He's already shown clear posessesion.

Yes. It's a ridiculous argument. He had control of the ball easily. He brought it in, showed control, then brought it out. There is not even a question.

Wrong. He already brings it in, then he brings it out. It's impossible to do that without possession

That's really one of the worst calls ever. Because if you watch the replay the only reason he is able to reach out to try to make it to the endzone is because he has total possession. He brings it IN before he thrusts it out. That is indisputable proof he has possession of the ball. So it's a TD.

It wasn't even close. That was a TD.

He clearly caught the ball. Inarguable. THEN and only then does he move it toward the goal line. And even if you call it a fumble he recovers it. That's an insanely bad call.

I have never ever thought the league was fixed. But that was an incredible call.

Oh !@#$.

The only reason it moved was WAY after he showed possession.

Oh. My God.

That's bull ****. No. He caught it easily. He brought it in, showing possession, then brought it out to get to the endzone. Clear possession.

That's so awesome

Holy hell.

It's a tough site for tough people. You have a lot to say and I'm glad you are saying it. But you also have to deal with both the naysayers and the sarcastic bastards. Have fun with it. You are the only one who truly knows if you have the goods or are full of crap. If you have the goods you will have the last laugh and you will be found 100% credible. So why worry short term about idjits that will be proven wrong if you are right. If you are full of crap you know that too.

He played very well today despite Dennison trying to neuter him in the second half.

You're so full of **** it's embarrassing. So if Tyrod plays well and we win, like we did today, it's because of McD. And if he's plays bad or we lose regardless of how he plays, it's because of him. You suck.

So in other words, you think with Tyrod, the worst QB ever, they have a decent chance to win in NE.

So let me get this straight, the Bills never beat the Pats, and you think Tyrod sucks balls, and you always predict the Bills to lose, but you think McD is great so you think despite Tyrod you ridicule people who think the Bills are going to lose in NE? You are the most hypocritical poster ever.

It was beyond awful. They like plays that don't work and don't like plays that do work.

You thought they would lose this game. Admit it.

I know you like McD. But that doesn't mean you think they are good. I guarantee you thought because of Tyrod you thought they would lose this game. Of course. I was only referring to JSP

You're the third most negative person on here!!! You always say the Bills suck.

So you believe or would bet we are going to beat NE in NE next week when they have something to play for? Yeah, right.

I don't think so. That assumes he completely ignored coaching and wasn't supposed to charge, in the one position that is usually the charge guy. It's impossible for me to imagine he was supposed to block but charged the ball at 7 yards.