Kelly the Dog

I don't think so. The line is bad. The receivers are really bad. The TEs are fair. The coaching is awful. We get some running but not because we get huge holes. In fact, our running game sucks. The QBs have been bad but if you put a good QB in this team I think you still suck. If you put a Josh on even the Texans with Hopkins and Fuller and Miller and OBrien the coach (who is good with QBs but not sure a good coach), Josh would be playing way better IMO. He was better than Watson today.

I didn't take consequence as you did. I was talking about in the second half and they needed a big play when nothing was going right. And it would have been a huge play of consequence.

You must have been drinking a lot. I just rewatched it. The ball was snapped at the 25. Joseph caught it at the 28-29. It was a four yard pass at the longest.

The deep ball to Benjamin that was called back was right on the money.

Yep. Or ignorance.

Yep. Outside of that first play he was pretty accurate.

That was about a 6-7 yard out. In no way was that a deep out. Not even close. And Peterman sucks at quick slants too.

There are some. The problem with Curley is that he is not a QB coach he is a WR coach. He's been a coach for like 30 years and never really was a QB in the NFL. It made no sense when they hired him.

It's possible that the WR to his right should have been off the line which would have made it legal. The refs call a certain player with the penalty because they have to and that is the official rule but it's not always their fault. I'm not making an excuse for Dimarco. It's Dabolls fault for having him out there in the first place. But it was not automatically his fault. One of the two guys needed to be on the line and one off. They both were on which made it illegal.

11 interceptions on 79 attempts is not really fair to Nate considering one or two of them were dropped by the defenders.

Baby steps.

Yep. Watson was incredibly careless. And he's good.

The funny thing is this is the first game in five that he looked like he tried 100%.

Yep. I never really believed in the ruin a rookie theory. I don't think any of those guys were going to be good. There are only ten guys on earth at a time that are good enough to be franchise QBs and one of the most important qualities is mental toughness x100.

It wasn't Josh's fault a 40 yard great pass was denied because Daboll put the fullback wide on the other side and he couldn't figure out whether he should be on the LOS or not, a rule you learn in sixth grade.

They had a decent chance. Watson was falling apart. Our defense was on fire.

His strong arm has contributed to at least a third of his completions so far. That's nonsense.

I agree. I was always for starting him but not expecting him to do well. I think this is invaluable experience for a raw rookie. The only problem is if it hurts his confidence and I just don't see that in a guy like him.

You forgot the one quarter filled bottle of Old Overholt on the desk.

Aaron Rogers? He's 1-2

He didn't play well enough to win. He was awful. That was a won in spite of him. And I like him a lot. He threw a bunch of nice balls. But he was awful. They won because of the pick six, they didn't score on a first and goal from the one after an interference in the endzone call. He was extremely careless with the ball.

Fine. One 2x terrible INT and one average INT.

I didn't see that. I watch games at Bills Backers Bar. What was said?

Allen was better than Watson today. Watson has Hopkins and Fuller, was worse against the rush, threw two horrible INTs, fumbled twice, was sacked six times, didn't feel the rush worse than Josh, and his only TD was a fabulous catch.

You can't shoot seven people when you're only carrying a six-shooter.