Kelly the Dog

That's completely wrong. He has a ton of talent. Maybe two tons. He needs some time to develop and reel that talent in.

Who is everyone?

Insanely quick is better than really fast. For a running back.

Isn't Rock Hill kinda redundant?

I think they keep 6 WR because one of them will be Roberts, and it's almost a given they will keep 4 RBs with Singletary. Likely no room for four TEs. Most teams keep three. Kroft and Knox are locks. That leaves one spot for Croom or Tommy Sweeney and maybe Fisher but I doubt it. Croom is very limited, and Knox does what Croom does, so they are redundant as players. Tommy Sweeney is a little different and more versatile, so he could easily stay.

I like Sills a lot more than Easley as a prospect and chance to make the team. Looks a lot like David Nelson pre-injury. We need a tall guy like that.

Not to mention that Anderson has one year and Barkley stinks.

I was thinking "goes deep."

I like the Tyree get a lot as a PS guy.

Yep. Decent chance. Kroft and Knox barring injury are locks. Croom does one thing pretty good. That's it. Since Knox can get downfield, I see no real use for a guy like Croom unless he has a killer camp and got substantially better. Most teams keep different kinds of TEs. Knox is Croom but a better blocker and higher upside.

Yep. Some other poster mentioned same thing. I could easily see him beating out Croom considering that Knox is making the team and is lanky and athletic. Kroft is a little of both receiver and blocker, and Tommy Sweeney (he should always be called Tommy Sweeney) the tough plugger who is a reliable short receiver and blocker.

I like this pick. He was amazing in Pinky Blinders.

https://thedraftnetwork.com/player/tommy-sweeney Decent detailed write-up.

The Bills have spoken about this publicly, that there are two ways to look at a WR corps: 1) to have a clear #1 WR who gets a huge number of targets (which doesn't just mean he's your team's best but a true #1, of which there may be only 15), and then a clear #2 and #3, etc)... OR... 2) You have no true #1 so you have several varied components and try to beat the other team with 4-5 different kinds of receivers and cogs. The Bills went after a #1 in Antonio Brown to some degree. When that didn't work, and no other #1 was likely available or would be a smart pick at #9 in the draft, they went the second route. They signed a deep threat and a solid slot guy. They have a possible #1 in Foster who has not proven anything yet, and a couple interesting prospects in Duke and Mackenzie, along with Zay. It makes a lot of sense. IMO we could use a big guy that can go deep, because that is the cog we don't have in the five components strategy.

I haven't seen this kind of keen "I know you are but what am I?" defense since third grade.

Small and slow is no way to go through NFL life, son. Hopefully, he comes up big, and fast.

This guy is a leader of men!!

Like the pick even more! That's great.

OR, BPA is nonsense and it's really BPAIPON.

Yep. I really like it, but again a huge position of need.

Surely the round will seep into the hierarchy, but which are your favorite or least favorite picks, in order... So far, I am... 1) Oliver (easy choice but didn't screw it up) 2) Ford (i really liked both of these top two choices) 3) Joseph (high upside for a fifth round and huge need and ST) 4) Knox (more because of huge need) 5) Singletary (like the player a lot, will likely change my hierarchy down the road)

Another BPA who is also an enormous position of need! What luck!

Hopefully, not slower than DK who runs a 4.33

Hopefully, Lesean doesn't take Vuh-SHAWN under his schwing.

Nice call, Gunner.