I agree , but there are a few exceptions out there;
Pros and media are getting paid to offer takes, so if there are gaps in their logic, this should get brought up and is fair game.
Florio and Sims, espec Florio has ridiculous rational this week. Rodney Harrison basically laughed at him when he implied Bills spirits and psyche would be damaged after Colts game. He's cherry picked select stats to articulate his gut feeling.
Sims is just picking Ravens to not look like a JA homer. His analysis was fairly spotty as well.
Nick Wright; this guy is just a troll hot take guy who has found a vein of attention.
Pete Schraeger; i didnt catch his take, but he was pretty affirmative we were the team to beat, now flops his vote. This year he's another guy in love with recency bias and "cold takes" that he switches / flops around on fair winds. He used to be the "writer" on the panel bringing everyone relevant data and research.....now he just kinda phones it in.