
Ol Dirty B
Community Member-
Posts
3,209 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Ol Dirty B
-
Again check my other post, I can understand why it would appear I'm calling the OP a loser but I genuinely was not. It's my fault for not being clearer. But for the rest of it, no, I saw no positives out of it. If I could have predicted that I would have done something else. I find it funny you continue on this tirade that even if they lost 100-0 You could still find positives but have yet to mention one. I apologized to the guy and it was a genuine misunderstanding
-
I didn't mean you specifically are a loser, but I could see how it could come across that way. My bad. It's just how I feel about the team, sure some guys were solid but I don't want to hear anyone being praised after today by people associated with the team. They're losers if they do that in my opinion. Again, I could be wrong, but I feel like you interpreted it as me calling you specifically a loser. Which wasn't my intention at all.
-
You gotta trade McCoy now... right?
Ol Dirty B replied to Rigotz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I only say trade shady out of good faith to him. That guy doesn't deserve this crap team And yes I know what he's making yada yada go on about your mother bagging groceries I don't care -
There are no positives. You're a loser if you're looking for positives off that game. They're professionals, not kids who need to be coddled. No positives from me.
-
I appreciate you coming back and owning it, that is admirable. However this gridrick guy, I'm interested in what he has to say about gambling in the future.
-
These people will never understand that. It's a pretty simple concept, the proven is better than the unknown. Especially a player like Mack. Instead they go on about you need more shots in the draft because you're gonna miss. Even though the hits will rarely, if ever, be as good as Mack. It's nonsense. Please don't make me ponder this hypothetical tonight.
-
Hockey has ruined this fanbase. I'm convinced of it tonight get that stupid team with their boring sport out of town. Bills fans talk about prospects and the practice squad like building a farm team. We can't give up 2 firsts for a player like Mack because of **** like that. They don't get it.
-
You're making this sound way easier than it is. No one knows who is the HOF players are, then you have one, that you even agree is one up for grabs. You go and get him. No one knew Khalil Mack would turn into what he is. You say HOF players are drafted every year like it's easy to find them. I'll give you the benefit of hindsight, who are the HOF players drafted from the last 3 years? I'm sure you can't predict them. You're simplifying things, no ****, it's easy for anyone to say a future Hall of Famer comes out every year, you just have to find them.
-
Fans are going to B word regardless. You accumulate talent. This team has been doing the opposite for 2 years now
-
No their aren't just other Mack's in upcoming drafts. Mack is a game breaker, does he win the game today? No. Because that was a !@#$ing **** show. But is he better than anyone we'll draft in the first round in the next 5 years? For sure I don't understand this fanbase and this coaching staff's aversion to talent. You stack that ****. You can make a beautiful scupture out of granite and you won't get ****. But you make a beautiful one out of marble and that **** is timeless.
-
well TYrod Taylor LEADS the Brown to a tie
Ol Dirty B replied to Socal-805's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Child please -
well TYrod Taylor LEADS the Brown to a tie
Ol Dirty B replied to Socal-805's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I'm not disagreeing with any of this. When I said Tyrod didn't win I only meant today. Child please. I'm done with these games you and I both know your opinion and I'm done with it. -
well TYrod Taylor LEADS the Brown to a tie
Ol Dirty B replied to Socal-805's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
But that's not what we are dealing with here. He's better than what we have. I never said he was the answer but trotting out this ****, Tyrod was worth keeping. -
well TYrod Taylor LEADS the Brown to a tie
Ol Dirty B replied to Socal-805's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I'm sorry that's all you can say when you're wrong. I get it, it's difficult to say, I was wrong. But someday you'll grow up and you'll be able to say I was wrong about something as meaningless as a football game. -
well TYrod Taylor LEADS the Brown to a tie
Ol Dirty B replied to Socal-805's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
These people helped run Taylor out of town, and just said PROCESS! And thought that was intelligent. They have nothing for nuance and now that their lil !@#$ing queen jewel next coming of Tom Brady failed, again. All they can cling to is that Tyrod also didn't win. -
well TYrod Taylor LEADS the Brown to a tie
Ol Dirty B replied to Socal-805's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
And giving up 5 plus turnovers means automatic loss. When I see these threads I see homers reaching for lifeboats abandoning the ship where they said all this dumb **** trying to deflect. -
well TYrod Taylor LEADS the Brown to a tie
Ol Dirty B replied to Socal-805's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Oh I apologize for relating it to the Bills on a bills board. The nerve of me. -
well TYrod Taylor LEADS the Brown to a tie
Ol Dirty B replied to Socal-805's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
And we are part of the 142 who have lost because of Peterman. What is your point? -
Hahaha it's just such a weird thing to say. But I agree, at least orenthal didn't suck.
-
You see Nathan Peterman and think he's someone my daughter should marry I hate being in this fanbase. We !@#$ing deserve 0-16. I don't even know what to do with that weird ass comment. Just say he's a good guy and move on to how he sucks.
-
That's an insult to Trent. Idk what Peterman got a degree in, but that's what he should be doing.
-
They're a bunch of !@#$ing gym teachers. I'll never understand why people defer to coaches and GMs. Especially Bills fans, when we've seen so many be so wrong.