Ol Dirty B

You sound like the racist guy who always makes sure he mentions his one black friend after saying something racist.

This post is just amazingly stupid. Someone please tell me I'm not the only one who sees it. He's boom, bust, or average. Wtf isn't he. Corners get beat guys. Tre is good, but not better than Gilmore. It's easy to forget Julio or AJ torching him when you want. And forgetting that Gilmore shut down Beckham when no one could to the point that Beckham is punching him. Both good corners, but I don't think Tre is better. He could get there, but I don't think he's better now.

Duke lacrosse went to court. It's reported that this guy has settled multiple times, and is now selling the team. He has a history he doesn't want to come out. The story reeks of he knows he's in the wrong and doesn't want the public shame that will come with it. The duke lacrosse comparison is a horrible one.

Weird. I've never been one to long for a man's voice talking to me. Maybe you should do some introspection Yea. That's weird. If you just said she's bad, which i'd agree with, fair point. But the fact you're just going on about how it can't be a woman announcing my game is just blatant sexism. I mean, it is the definition of it and you do have a problem. It's not a huge problem if it's just this, but I'm not inclined to believe that. You're sexist.

Isn't the !@#$ed up thing how he has likely behaved?

The list of garbage signings the poster listed off... and the over the top optimism is some sarcasm I can appreciate. Cheers to McDermott for bringing us all Vlad. I needed some Vlad playing football in my life It's not a straw man at all. The guy threw five !@#$ing interceptions and showed no reason he deserved to be handed the job.

I agree with a lot of this. The issue with the franchise has been ownership. Was happy they bought the team, but they have been awful in my opinion.

I'm lost. So now are you doing an about face and saying you don't have a source? You're doing what most people exactly accused you of, just making a bunch of predictions based on obvious things. All publically known. Cousins could be a target, one of Minnesota's QBs could be a target. Smith's future is up in the air. All of these predictions can be drawn from doing what you are exactly saying here. I know, because debating whether some guy in Dunkirk is breaking news isn't a perfect example of trivial nonsense.

You mean the guy who gets drunk and breaks into people's houses is a piece of ****? What a surprise. The guy was always a scum bag.

Let's see what Dunkirk Don has to say.

Ok I disagree... I don't see a majority of threads by any means criticizing McDermott. But I genuinely mean I could have missed them, sorry if I mischaracterized your post.

I'm going to disagree. I wasn't able to follow the game closely so I'm not sure what the fourth down distance to go was, but an onside kick has a 15% success rate, and you're leaving the brunt of the work, if successful for after the kick with no timeouts. I think you're better off going td, you can get in field goal range from an onside recovery in one or two plays easily. Driving 60 yds in 40 seconds is craziness when you need a td. Where did I say anything negative about McDermott on today's game?

Dude, you're a homer. It's ok, but just be self aware of it. Other people are entitled to their opinion, let them have it. This thread is essentially, "hey if you disagree with my feelings, don't post it." Instead of pointing out how the time management isn't an issue, or correct decisions were made. You just responded with, stop your criticism because I don't like it and instead let's pile on this other ****ty decision about a team none of us like. I'm not here to talk about the dolphins. If you want Adam Gase talk, go find a dolphins board. It's the exact same thing when Mcdermott punted last week, and some people were saying that Pagano made even worse decision and why aren't we talking about that. Yea, that's correct, Pagano did make a bad decision. But no one here gives a flying !@#$ about Pagano.

I never liked him, so I'm not defending Mitch. But I think it's funny. Write off Mitch as a bust but a lot of you same posters will talk about how Zay is good, and WR is a tough transition. Like QB isn't? This thread is ridiculous, I don't know how obnoxious some posters were about Trubisky but it better have been god awful to warrant this.

Yea... I would say a GM who couldn't hire his coach, or confidently say who had control over the 53 man roster probably had undefined roles... I'd think that's pretty simple to infer. The fact that the Tyrod issue last year even came down to having to go to Terry shows the organization had no organization. If you think they looked like they knew what they were doing, wow. Do you live in Buffalo? I'm just trying to figure out whether it's worth discussing things with you. Because if you're someone who moved out of the area, I'd get being so out of touch. But if you are in WNY, it's just not even worth the time. It's not an accomplishment... But it shows how the organization wasn't structured properly. You're building the argument against yourself. Just think for a moment about what other people are saying

Isn't it equally fair though that this team is devoid of talent and that's because of him? Everyone says, look at what he did with this roster, and talks about how bad the roster is. The guy made the roster bad. I'm not in to having a guy who cuts salary, keeps promising the future, gets rid of talent, and "over achieves" into an 8-8 season. That's hell. I've seen enough of that, which is why when any coach does things that resemble that, they are on a short leash with me. Which doesn't mean anything, so all you McDermott lovers don't need to take offense to that. I can't fire him, I'm just saying I don't like the style.

Wow, being an Arsenal fan must have done a number on you.

I'm admittedly biased... Well not really, biased, I didn't come into his hiring railing against McDermott. I just don't care for him. Almost everything about him, I dislike. He seems like a good guy, but his demeanor, his coaching history, what he did to the roster, how he comes across as arrogant most of the time in my opinion. Yet he can't own his arrogance, it's always veiled in some form of fake humility. That's just how I read him. So I'm not going to vote. I'll say the team has done better than I thought it would, but the losses, wow, they've been worse than I expected. His general outlook on how to build a team, I'm undecided. I'm not sure what he believes in offensively, but if it's what we've seen so far, that's unacceptable. I don't like his usage of timeouts, and his use of challenges have been terrible as well. But what else would you expect from a guy coming from the Andy Reid coaching tree. I'm leaning towards I don't like him, again, I'm admittedly biased or kind of feeling a certain way and I feel it's too early too. So I won't vote, I don't think my opinion reflects most Bills fans. I think both definitely contribute to it. The gutting of the roster, starting Peterman. The guy has certainly tried to press any and all buttons that could piss you off if you're not a complete homer.

I've said nothing that is counter to this. You talk about my posts, and you've responded to nothing I've ever said. The team had some luck with turnovers, when that well dried up, the over achieving stopped. You should know, since you like to steep yourself into the numbers, that turnover differential, like fumbles, are the most inconsistent statistics, almost random. They change year to year a ton, I'm sure you read Barnwell since you love numbers so much. The Bills got to 5-2 riding a wave of turnovers that just was not going to continue. That's how they got to where they are now. I also like the fact that you're treating the longest post season drought in North American sports as though it statistically makes sense. Their are always outliers, you should know this. That's what the Bills are. Yea, you'd get a lot of attention if you predicted "4 and 10"

No go on... Let's see what you have to say. You said my opinion of the Bills is the equivalent of domestic abuse. I want to hear what anyone has to say who is that far off the deep end. You have nothing to say... This is why this gets drawn out, and bank accounts, and 11th grade math books get brought up. This team hasn't made the playoffs in 17 years, since you're a !@#$ing savant tell me what the probability of that is? You've gone on for 5 posts saying absolutely nothing. You know my posts, let's discuss. Enough with this stalling ****.

I get probability... No problems with it, but you never responded to how the probability of a team missing the playoffs for 17 years straight... Off the top of your head. Anytime someone says something like that you go back to patriarchy, conspiracy or some other bs... You said you lurked my posts and you know'em... then let's discuss them Russel Crowe. Again, you said my opinion of the Bills was intrinsically wife beating. You're nuts dude. Get a grip

I don't agree with a single answer you gave me, and it's counter to what everyone else has said who covers the team. I'll even go as far as leaning towards your direction, that Beane is calling a lot of shots. Which I don't buy, I think McDermott has more say than what coaches traditionally have. However, as you tried to dismiss my belief with who's calling shots you showed your own ignorance. Tolbert was signed before Beane was here. How do you explain that? Who was calling that shot? We know he wasn't a Whaley guy. Tyrod wasn't a Whaley guy, and the decision to keep him was made before Beane was here too. I'm sick of losing but that isn't clouding my judgment, I'm just seeing **** for what it is. You are making things fit your narrative more than I am. Tell me otherwise.

Their over under wasn't 4.5 wins... So that was never a bet, anyone ever made this year. He also didn't bet money on 4 wins I'm guessing. Do you suffer from some kind of personality disorder? You truly are odd.

OK I thought that at first with the Bills beater comment but was lost. I'll say I was wrong... I have no problem admitting it. I could sit here and argue with it, but then I'd be bombarded with being labelled a conspiracy theorist, something about patriarchy, and then insulted about my bank account in regards to yours. They over achieved in my opinion. You're seriously wacked dude, if you want to discuss my posts, let's discuss them. But if you want me to argue against what has happened, I'm simply not going to. The team is at least a 7 win team, so arguing they are a 4-6 win team is simply revisionist history. I've never had an problem admitting I was wrong. You are clearly the person who struggles with that... You're !@#$ed... No ifs, and or buts You compared my opinion of the Bills to beating a woman

We all get **** wrong, except for this guy apparently.