Ol Dirty B

Their isn't anything sexist about that. You clearly lack an ability to understand nuance. Someone saying her voice is annoying is not the same as the guy I was quoting saying it just doesn't feel right to have a woman announce a football game. Talk about simple Is anyone really surprised that a fan base that prides itself on chasing down anyone who says anything bad about them on twitter, #billsmafia, or takes pride in having over the top tailgates where women blow guys for jerseys, guys take shots off girls asses, or they become known for jumping through tables would have an issue with a woman announcing a game? And I'm not saying all of you who didn't like her are in that boat, but this fan base does not earn any benefit of the doubt or project a good image of itself. This fan base is about as ignorant as it can get. I can't believe you posted something this stupid after editing. You're an uneducated moron. What the hell does affirmative action have to do with any of this? If I follow this thought to its' logical conclusion, which I imagine will be tough for you. You don't watch the games because you know if you do, they will make you say something that people will widely regard as stupid? By all means then, please don't watch and please stop posting. Who is they? I mean really man, this post is just horrible and makes no sense. I love that it's always the people saying don't bring politics in to my sports bringing politics in to sports. AA and PC culture... WTF? What is PC about kneeling during the anthem since that's the only legitimate thing you could be offended by the NFL is responsible for. It's the opposite of PC. And also, you're still watching. More empty threats there.

I agree, it will be entertaining. People like making people eat their words.

So Why Gilmore sucks, and what I don't understand is in these measurables. . His attitude... (People have been on this since he got drafted) Toughness... This is just typical dumb football fan argument. Trade guy because he gets hurt... All of these guys are tough. Gilmore played with a !@#$ing cast on man... Get real. The whole he's not tough argument is just stupid when it comes to professional athletes. Mental... not sure what that even means... Aren't attitude and mental largely one in the same? He's never shown to not understand coverages... and isn't the narrative that Belichick only signs smart guys. I'm not saying it's true, because Gronk is one huge example of a stupid player he features but usually the narrative is the Pats only sign the smart guys. I don't know if Gilmore is smart or not, but I can't say he's ever came across as stupid. Physical? Gilmore is strong, big, pressing corner. I'm not even sure how he doesn't measure up Physically. The one attribute you can actually evaluate numerically he passes. The others are just stupid football cliches you heard and can't even define them. I'm completely confident that I get it, you are the one I'm pretty sure has no clue what they are watching other than they want the Bills to win. Which is fine, because that's what I want to.

Really? And Clay getting in the neutral zone, arrogantly calling it's the wheel route... He could have communicated it without stepping up towards the LOS. Clay was being arrogant too. But I guess it doesn't matter when he does it. We like to pick and choose.

I think white looks good and may end up being better than him. I don't really think he's better than Gilmore at this point though Defenses weren't throwing near Gilmore at all in his career until Rex got here and made a disaster of the secondary.

I agree, but I think you'd end up in the same place as Arsenal. The guy who hosts it, his name is escaping me at the moment, seems like a really normal rational dude. Then you have DT and Troops going ballistic, which I like them too, but it is crazy. And I think they all make solid points besides the dude who is old as **** and just rambles on all the time. I just think what they have is a tough dynamic to recreate. Even other PL teams can't do it. I watched one episode of my teams fantv and didn't make it 2 minutes because it was just boring. It is an interesting idea though. I'm sure some fan of an NFL team will try it.

This is exactly why the Benjamin and Watkins trades are so ill conceived. He also doesn't go downfield, because, who the !@#$ do you throw to downfield with any sense of reliability on this team? They have no deep threats, and they don't have guys running deep routes a lot of the time.

I agree, White, Dawkins and Milano all look like solid picks. I'm fine with the philosophy in later rounds, however, when it's the first two rounds, I'd like to see where the trend goes.

No, just no... Everyone makes fun of Arsenal Fan Tv, and I agree. It is entertaining, especially after losses. However, even with how melodramatic they are. They pull it off 1000x better than Bills fans would. They're all articulate, and for the most part, pretty sober. They don't have jackasses jumping through tables. You see what this fanbase does for attention already, could you imagine if they caught on in American football the same way Arsenal Fan Tv has in European football. It'd be disastrous, and I know they've had their issues as well, but the atmosphere after an NFL game isn't the same for the most part here as it is for an Arsenal Tottenham match. Jumping through tables, and all that BS wouldn't hold a candle to the **** this fan base would pull.

Wow you just slayed dunkirk don. Wow.

I'm not blaming you but that is ridiculous. The staff doesn't like young players... So most legit first round talent they don't like because they are good enough to come out and get paid before using up all NCAA eligibility. It's like these guys don't like or want talent. It worries me that this kind of attitude may be prevalent in the decision making circles. Love Kyle Williams, love Freddie... But I'll take talent all day every day over guys who work their asses off. I hate that stupid blue collar bs so many people eat up. Sorry to go on a rant.

He looks the part how? Stuff like this just passes as knowledgeable but someone throws out something that actually supports their point and they get dismissed. He's caught 25 of 60 targets, and that's not all on him, but he is responsible for that too. He doesn't at all look the part other than he's an athletic guy, and his level of athleticism is a dime a dozen, it's not hard to find at all. Marquise Goodwin is looking like a world beater compared to him. That's a guy with athleticism that separates him from most other prospects. And Tyrod hasn't been good, but Marquise was performing before the trade for Jimmy G. He was playing good with QB's on Tyrod's level. Only two things can really be used to separate the two, the player himself, or the coaching. That's the real place where blame needs to be laid and most of you on here won't want anything to do with blaming either for Zay's struggles.

What are you saying? If we traded Dareus and we end up with a Peterman or a Milano. It's still an awful trade. Where is their any proof of this later round stuff? Milano is nice but 1 guy doesn't deviate much from what I'd estimate are late round hits in a draft in this teams history or really what happens in the league.

I wasn't stumped. The conclusion is clear to draw. When someone says "Even My (insert here)" says something to support a previously drawn conclusion because you know, a girl doesn't like her. So that means it's cool for all of us to not like her. I'm not full of **** you just don't like what I'm saying. Which is fine. But to say I can't support what I'm saying is just wrong and simple. It's an easy dismissal tactic. Or maybe I'm just giving you too much credit for being able to read into things.

And you can keep your type writer, your pager, your fax machine, your out house, your wing t formation, your vcr, and everything else that was left in history. You just might be considered a hoarder at some point and get on a reality show.

You can keep your stance. Seems like you're a bit sensitive about that.

Not at all, put me on ignore. I'm not going to break down that post. You're being ridiculous just like how you came into this thread. Playing the I gotta believe this because people on a message board will label me card. I didn't label him anything. The other guy I called a sexist. And he is one, but you don't quote those posts. Never said he couldn't make points or say whatever. Just said I'm going to make fun of him for his antiquity.

Yea I wasn't clear. I think both Aikman and Buck have annoying voices. Then I switched thoughts to Romo. Now nantz, I haven't heard a better voice since Pat Summerall. If anyone can be brought back from the dead, I vote him.

It's pretty apparent on its face. I'm not going to explain it, I have faith in you thinking it through.

That team is annoying. I actually like him overall, but I kind of find Romos voice to be annoying I also don't mean that post to be an acceptance of annoying voices.

No I'm just happy I got what you actually meant out. You didn't say Gilmore isn't good in your original post. And I can just say you're wrong. Gilmore is good.

I didn't care for her, but what you're doing here is childish. You can not like her. But when someone just says, I don't like a woman announcing my game, it's not just about her. It extends to all women. She can have an annoying voice, plenty of announcers do.

I wouldn't expect it to change. This inability to deal with something as simple as a woman calling a game is ingrained in people. It's also sexist, like the definition of it. You're saying you don't want a woman to do something because it's not how it is traditionally done. Call me corny, sure, but I'm going to make fun of you because people like you deserve it. You, and I'm talking about you specifically, didn't make any points other than "I just don't want women calling my games".

Cheers to that

As the president has shown, when you say something stupid. Just say something even more stupid. Eventually people won't know how to respond. And this is where I'm at.