Ol Dirty B

No I didn't fail to grasp it at all. The point your making makes no sense in reality, and don't play coy. Everyone knows who people assume to be of African descent. But you can go on acting like Hannity or some other bs to make your point not grounded in how people perceive the world.

Still dirty from Halloween. Your mom's been slacking on the laundry

You're right... Richie that kitty, if you're gonna be racist you gotta go hard in the paint .

Then you're just flat out dumb, and you couldn't pick a better city to use as an example than Boston when making a point that shows ignorance. You can be black, white, Asian, whatever and be from Boston. All of those previous things I mentioned have the potential of creating an opinion of some people's minds before you speak. No one can tell someone is from Boston and appropriately hate them just by looking at them. It's not even close to accurate what you're saying.

Well now I can't disagree with you anymore. Ignore my prior posting, my bad lol

Are you serious with this post?

Your posts have been stupid in this thread . I bet you've been saying the same thing in different variations for 20 years.

Manish Mehta is a douche.

I'm going to go ahead and guess you never took any basic stat classes or statistical analysis classes in any field. Not that they are necessary, but no one who ever has would say that stat is good. You mean like he did in Carolina last year after they let Norman walk? But you're right, they were sound. He doesn't need players, it's not like they gave up 300 yards to one receiver.

First of all, learn how to write in paragraphs and organize your thoughts. I skimmed through it, so I could be wrong, but I believe the point is what I assumed it to be. That Shady could potentially be selfish by playing through his injury. Check what he said Thursday after practice, and you'll find he has the opposite attitude. This thread is pointless, a simple check of the Bills blog on ESPN.com or almost any other site that has one covering the Bills makes this post useless. And I like how if he plays through the injury it's selfish. Tyrod, or Sammy does it, and they get no credit for it or are soft when it effects their performance. Glenn gets no credit for it. But if Kyle does it, or Eric Wood does it, then it will live on forever in Bills history. I'll never call a guy selfish for playing through an injury. Bills fans should seriously reconsider what they say and do, because we around here might not be aware of it. But it has a definite pattern.

Well the Bills Seattle game last year wasn't all that bad. Pittsburgh cincy wasn't bad this year either. Do you watch Thursday nights?

I wouldn't be opposed to that. Him or Smokin Jay.

Lol at people insulting another city because of their football team. Or trying to insult them because they could lose it. The whole thread just devolved into immaturity. I get the point and I'm tempted to do the same, because I've been to Jacksonville. I know how it is there, but lets just be better. We get it from everyone in the league. Who cares. It's amazing how these people ridicule other cities for no reason other than there footballs teams playings another cities footballs teams. Not saying this about you, but damn, sports fans are so stupid.

You just said that all the starters in the secondary are better than him. Which I agree with, we can sign a FA or draft a guy. He is replaceable. Using this 8-3 stat is lunacy. If you think they went 1-4 in the other games because he didn't play, I don't know what the hell you are watching. He's been good, I'm fine with keeping him, but he isn't nearly as critical piece to this team as the 8-3 stat makes him look.

Between first and second team, they had 2 all pros... You're really using numerous their to make it seem like they have talent loaded all over the roster. They had a couple all pro's would be more accurate, oh yea, and their punter, but who cares. They also went 9-2 in games decided by one possession. They are fools gold.

You do know that Gruden has a worse winning percentage than Brian Billick, right?

It's actually only the second time they've been alive going into week 17 during drought and they got the help both times. I don't know if I'd call it bad luck, they've just been a bad franchise. Either way, wasn't enjoyable.

Only the Raiders would do something this stupid. Al Davis's idiocy has been passed down his bloodline.

It's not dumb at all and I'm not going to defend a point i wasn't making. I didn't say anything about Rivers or Brees or make this point about them for a reason. The saints have been a mess for the last few years before this year, the LA has been a mess too. They both also play in tougher divisions. There is absolutely a point in talking about how they went 7-9. The guy is getting franchise money and the team can no longer afford to surround him with the talent they could when he was on that rookie deal. If you're getting 30 mil, you better be able to carry a team in an average to below average division to the playoffs. You're making this point like Tyrod is sitting here surrounded by talent when the teams are pretty similar in talent level. But people don't want to pay Tyrod 18 mil or whatever. If you don't want to pay him 18, which I respect, I would think you wouldn't want to give cousins 30. Again, you can talk about who can make what throws. Go look at the QBR, me saying Cousins is even a little better is being generous to you. And even then, he's not worth 30 million dollars. There's no consistency in want to pay cousins that money but Taylor not 18.

It's not well said. It's completely wrong. This team is not good, it's one of the worst teams to ever make the playoffs. Whether you want to use DVOA or point differential. It is not a team loaded with talent carrying the Qb. They are just a lucky team in a down year, and I'm happy for that. But nothing he has said shows any good reasoning for paying cousins 30 mil per. He went 7-9 in a down year in his division. Andrew luck carries garbage teams into the playoffs and is worth 30 mil. Cousins simply isn't. No, not going to do that for you. That's a lazy post. Cousins QBR is 52, Tyrods is 53. So if Tyrod isn't good, then cousins isn't. I don't get how it's all of the sudden on me to prove why the guy isn't worth 30 mil. You show why he is.

I never said anything about Drew Brees or Philip Rivers. To put Kirk Cousins in their class is laughable, it's also completely irrelevant. Im not sure whay point you are tired of making and i dont care to hear it, so spare us all the time, because it wasnt the point i made at all. Look at QBR this year and see who's is better? I'm not opposed to upgrading from Taylor but cousins isn't an upgrade at all and has not done more with less. For every weapon you say Kirk has lost I can match with one this team has lost. You say Jay Gruden isn't a great coach and I don't disagree, Dennison and McDermott aren't offensive geniuses either. Yet Tyrods got a 53 QBR in a scheme that doesn't suit him and Kirk has a 52 QBR. But I'll assume you don't like that point either because it doesn't fit in with paying a mediocre QB 30 mil a year. Cousins is not good.

Even Jerry and Bucky don't really bother me. They just talk and talk and try to gain clicks, but this went a bit too far. For a publication that will come here and beg for us to pay for their Bills coverage to publish this blatant attention seeking article should be the final straw. Links to that junk or mentions of it should be scrubbed from the site. I know I won't ever click on a link or buy another publication of theirs.

If those are the reasons for the those trades, they sound awfully similar to the motivation for trades that we made in the past year. I like that we were the winners in those trades, and now we are making moves for the same reasons the losers in those trades made.

We'll see. I'm still holding out hope the league will catch up with him, even though that looks more and more like it will be wrong. Or maybe I should hope he's great and the pats can't find a qb for the next 100 years. I don't know what to do with that one

None of this is right. McDermott was wrong. He threw 5 ints. You don't know who was consulted in the locker room and quite honestly, I don't care who was or of they were. It's not lazy, it's a fact he was 100% wrong playing Peterman. Why we are still having this debate or someone would want to just clearly be wrong, I don't understand. They made the playoffs, he made a bad decision. Let's just move on.