Ol Dirty B

If anyone earned the right to be cut after a few plays, a quarter, or half. It was Peterman. He was awful. The only reason he will be around for another year or two is because their is absolutely no advantage in cutting him.

Who are these guys?

Throw him away. The guy wasn't a first round pick and passed over by every team multiple times for a reason. He sucks, goodbye.

Do you know who old dirty is? Or are you older than dirt? Don't !@#$ with dirt Mcgert. Secondly, I brought that up because the roasts on comedy central have became not even worth watching and get awful ratings ever sense it became Trump, Beiber, Sheen, and whoever was the joke that none of the roasters knew but was in the public spotlight. I didn't prove your point at all, you proved you don't know anything about pop culture.

Are you going?

You say this like you're someone important.

Who's the one who needs to grow up? You're complaining that Fred is going to get roasted for no reason. It's ridiculous. I can't imagine how unbearable your small talk is if this is something you write paragraphs about.

Actually roasts originated with people that are beloved. They only recently moved onto the theme of roasting the easy target, the publically hated by a bunch of people that barely know them on comedy central in the last 10 years. You don't know what you're talking about. Like at all. Also, again, even if they had it wrong. Who the !@#$ cares. And you threw out Pegula to be roasted, isn't he in the same vein as Fred? A guy who has given all to his community, is a respected, viewed as a good guy among his peers but just hasn't been successful in a myopic view? Even your examples don't make sense. Again, this thread is just wrong on so many levels.

Weak response. Your posts in this thread have been weak generally.

This thread is awful. You shouldn't be allowed to make anymore.

If someone talks politics to me in person, I just let them go on and on or egg them on to the point they take a ridiculous position. Then I wait for them to leave and call them Hitler.

That's all fair and I appreciate it. It gives context to what you're saying. Does none of that have to do with being on a team devoid of a great running game and playing from behind a fair amount? I just watch him play, granted not often and see their record with him and struggle to see top 5. I will cede though, he did lose his top two receivers over the course of his career and still has performed. I guess we'll just agree to disagree. If the Bills sign him I hope I'm wrong and you're right. And if he goes else where I hope the opposite.

Ok. Solid rebuttal. You tell people to do homework and respond with that. He's not top 5. Not even close.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/qbr It's pretty easy. He's not even close to top 5. I don't care what metric you go by... Stats Eye test Name recognition Previous success He is at his best borderline top 10

You're name definitely suits you. Talking championship game and Superbowl contender. I don't see it, but to each their own.

This was never an 11-5 or 12-4 team. They had a bad DVOA and one of the worst point differentials to ever make the playoffs

He's not top 5, not even close Brady Rodgers Brees Wentz Goff Wilson Rothlisberger Stafford Luck if he gets healthy again. Rivers Ryan... Top 10 is even debatable. Not even consistent.

Nothing confirms he got more than one first round pick, let alone one.

First of all, the Pats play that Jags game every year vs numerous teams. I don't know why it's so hard to accept that Brady is a great equalizer when the rest of the team is less talented than the opponent. As the rule is written, plenty of people agree that it was the right call. Most of them though are able to avoid personal bias. There is at least 3 people in this thread who are clearly incapable of that. Just don't put much stock in the "I played a lot of football" guy's opinion as to who is or is not a douche. Or really anything for that matter. It's a self awareness thing.

This post isn't even close to accurate. You have no rational basis to say they would have never blown it dead if the Pats recovered. Absolutely none. Go for it, bump it everyday. You're just doubling down on your idiocy. Not me. I'm a douche because you're clearly a conspiracy theorist moron? I have no problem being viewed as a douche by you.

That's not how officials rule though. I completely agree, let the play play out. But that's not just the Pats games to the Pats benefit they do that, it's routinely an issue all around the league.

I've never seen it at a level beneath d1 college. Also no one cares if you played football for years. If you've played for years and never noticed... I'll just leave that alone. Who cares. This happens all the time, the qb and/or coaches run around calling for it to be reset. You said you'd delete it if it was old or fake news. This is old fake news. Delete it. How do they lose to the jaguars if not for officiating? The Steelers call was the correct call.

Do you not have any friends? You're gonna watch videos of prospects instead? I'm sorry, but get a life. I usually don't want to watch it, and if I ever followed through on not watching it, I'm not youtubing prospects. That's just pointless.

Can't you be an entertaining troll? If you suck at it, just don't do it.

It's very odd... Midnight it's tweeted out. On Google I don't see anything. It's a simple method but usually is pretty good. At midnight is what's oddest to me about when Tim Graham is tweeting this